By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - The best VR headset, after a week at GDC - Gizmag

Tagged games:

OdinHades said:
MortienGerrux said:

Then get a GearVR lol.

 

Remote play > GearVR = Win/Win and you are saving about 400$

I'm pretty sure PSVR is superior to GearVR.

Do you rememember what people say about buying a certain console? It's all about the games

 

 

Heck people even got PS4 games running on it:



Around the Network
MortienGerrux said:
OdinHades said:

I'm pretty sure PSVR is superior to GearVR.

Do you rememember what people say about buying a certain console? It's all about the games

 

 

Heck people even got PS4 games running on it:

Dude... you are freaking rediculous. You are LITERALLY attacking PSVR but praising everything else... including Mobile VR (which is horse shit for gaming).



thismeintiel said:

I wonder if Gizmondo Gizmag will be upset about the PSVR being the bestselling headset, especially when it drops to $249-$299 in a year or so. Also gotta laugh when they say they aren't rooting against it, yet call it broken for poor reasons. No other person that I have watched/read has called it broken. Far from it. They have all basically said that while it's obviously not going to be on par with the options you'll have to pay near twice as much for, it's still a really good experience.

Actually if the person who used it is correct, there stands a chance it will not be the best selling headset.



kowenicki said:
bananaking21 said:

you pretty much were, yes. 

 

what, when asked to give an argument you back down from you claim? LOL.. why am i not surprised. 

No, I am referring to a preview that claims it.  I then asking for clarification on the post referring to the wii in relation to this report.

So why dont you stop being so defensive and deal with the report instead of attacking anyone that doesnt say this report is shit the PSVR is awesome.

I cant believe someone gets away earleir with calling the previewer a pedo simply becasue he doesnt kiss the PSVR's arse.  This forum is reverting to trype once again isnt it.  Never changes.

LOL man, thats some great spin. care to back your refrence up though?

https://d.maxfile.ro/xcybqybqke.gif

and here are two articles that use the move and neither of them claim its "broken" or even bad for that matter. and rest assured, i can dig up A LOT more.

 

@underlined: LOL... we are making shit up now? where did i go around doing that. im sure you cant show where i did that, because you just made up that accusation

 

and at that last part. get off your high horse, dont go around pissing all over other users when you are one of the worst on this site. 

here is a very accurate and functional Move presentation, doesnt seem broken to me. where is your data other than one lone preview?

 



sabvre42 said:

 Dude... you are freaking rediculous. You are LITERALLY attacking PSVR but praising everything else... including Mobile VR (which is horse shit for gaming).

 

I'm not attacking lmao, I just said it's not worth the price for 10-20 demo's.

I'm not the one making clickbait articles like the whole internet does now saying PSVR will win because it's 100$ cheaper then Oculus Rift. Or lying that you need a 1000$ PC to play some basic looking VR games like No Man Sky.

And why is Mobile VR horseshit? When it's about 50x cheaper then the other options? 

You get what you pay for.



Around the Network
MortienGerrux said:

I'm not attacking lmao, I just said it's not worth the price for 10-20 demo's.

I'm not the one making clickbait articles like the whole internet does now saying PSVR will win because it's 100$ cheaper then Oculus Rift. Or lying that you need a 1000$ PC to play some basic looking VR games like No Man Sky.

And why is Mobile VR horseshit? When it's about 50x cheaper then the other options? 

You get what you pay for.

Are you prinz ?

Sorry if it's not the case, I'm still calibrating my prinz alt sensor :P



MortienGerrux said:
sabvre42 said:

Dude... you are freaking rediculous. You are LITERALLY attacking PSVR but praising everything else... including Mobile VR (which is horse shit for gaming).

 

I'm not attacking lmao, I just said it's not worth the price for 10-20 demo's.

I'm not the one making clickbait articles like the whole internet does now saying PSVR will win because it's 100$ cheaper then Oculus Rift.

And why is Mobile VR horseshit? When it's about 50x cheaper then the other options?

You get what you pay for.

PSVR is $100 cheaper than occulus for the bundle -- $200 for the stand alone SKU. BOTH SKUS contain motion controls, while the OR does not.

PSVR only requires a $300-350 console. Many, many, many people have PS4s. While PCs are 10x more common, not many people have high level gaming PCs that are capable of running VR.

PSVR is the most comfortable, and best headset with glasses. PSVR is being designed to allow for a quasi shared experience / even a "replacement TV". They have already announced that you will be able to watch PS Vue through the PSVR.

----

Mobile VR isn't as cheap as you think it is. You STILL need a $650-800 mobile device to insert into the holder. The mobile device will be DRAINED insanely fast and won't last for more than 1-2 hours, and cannot process high Frame rates or actual effects. Essentially the only thing Mobile VR will be good for is porn, movies, porn, porn and porn.

I truly get that you  LOVE your PC. But you are in a minority of gamers and even a smaller minority of people that actually buy top of the line graphics cards. Most people that game on PC buy something JUST strong enough to run stuff on medium settings.



Just one question about VRs I might have missed it but are Occulus nad/or Vive wireless? How's the cables and installation? I know PSVR comes with a smaller console and more wires but are the others also?

As for PS Move I think they are comparing PS Move to the ones from both HTC and Occulus which are newer so might sport better technology. But just because you guys experienced them 5 years ago and it worked doesn't mean everyone had bought them and tried them back then. To someone that never tried them until today and has to compare them with the newest technology ofc they will say things like it doesn't work properly.



sabvre42 said:
MortienGerrux said:

 

I'm not attacking lmao, I just said it's not worth the price for 10-20 demo's.

I'm not the one making clickbait articles like the whole internet does now saying PSVR will win because it's 100$ cheaper then Oculus Rift.

And why is Mobile VR horseshit? When it's about 50x cheaper then the other options?

You get what you pay for.


PSVR only requires a $300-350 console. Many, many, many people have PS4s. While PCs are 10x more common, not many people have high level gaming PCs that are capable of running VR.

PSVR is the most comfortable, and best headset with glasses. PSVR is being designed to allow for a quasi shared experience / even a "replacement TV". They have already announced that you will be able to watch PS Vue through the PSVR.

----

Mobile VR isn't as cheap as you think it is. You STILL need a $650-800 mobile device to insert into the holder. The mobile device will be DRAINED insanely fast and won't last for more than 1-2 hours, and cannot process high Frame rates or actual effects. Essentially the only thing Mobile VR will be good for is porn, movies, porn, porn and porn.

I truly get that you  LOVE your PC. But you are in a minority of gamers and even a smaller minority of people that actually buy top of the line graphics cards. Most people that game on PC buy something JUST strong enough to run stuff on medium settings.

You call me biased yet you are the one telling lies.

PCVR only requires 1 HDMI cable and 2 USB 3.0 cables. That's all. You don't need anything else to connect the device to a PC/laptop. 

PSVR requires a 300-350$ console just to see anything on the screen.

The HTC Vive is the most comfortable, because it has the best headtracking, which means less motion sickness.

MobileVR will run on any smartphone you want, you dont' need a 1440p or even 1080P smartphone. It won't drain any battery because it's connected to your PC/laptop via MicroUsb. You can even run it wirelessly via Wi-fi!

Also I don't understand how games like GTA 5, Fallout 4 or Dark Souls 3 isn't considered "actual effects"


Like with any PC game, you will need different hardware for different games. Here is the 400$ PC I posted earlier:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant


CPU: Intel Pentium G3258 3.2GHz Dual-Core Processor  ($65.99 @ SuperBiiz) 

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard  ($39.99 @ Newegg) 

Memory: Avexir Core Series 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory  ($24.99 @ Newegg) 

Storage: Seagate Barracuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  ($45.89 @ OutletPC) 

Video Card: PowerColor Radeon R9 380 4GB PCS+ Video Card  ($172.99 @ Newegg) 

Case: Thermaltake VL80001W2Z ATX Mid Tower Case  ($24.99 @ Micro Center) 

Power Supply: Thermaltake TR2 500W ATX Power Supply  ($24.99 @ Newegg) 

Total: $399.83



MortienGerrux said:
sabvre42 said:


PSVR only requires a $300-350 console. Many, many, many people have PS4s. While PCs are 10x more common, not many people have high level gaming PCs that are capable of running VR.

PSVR is the most comfortable, and best headset with glasses. PSVR is being designed to allow for a quasi shared experience / even a "replacement TV". They have already announced that you will be able to watch PS Vue through the PSVR.

----

Mobile VR isn't as cheap as you think it is. You STILL need a $650-800 mobile device to insert into the holder. The mobile device will be DRAINED insanely fast and won't last for more than 1-2 hours, and cannot process high Frame rates or actual effects. Essentially the only thing Mobile VR will be good for is porn, movies, porn, porn and porn.

I truly get that you  LOVE your PC. But you are in a minority of gamers and even a smaller minority of people that actually buy top of the line graphics cards. Most people that game on PC buy something JUST strong enough to run stuff on medium settings.

You call me biased yet you are the one telling lies.

PCVR only requires 1 HDMI cable and 2 USB 3.0 cables. That's all. You don't need anything else to connect the device to a PC/laptop. 

PSVR requires a 300-350$ console just to see anything on the screen.

The HTC Vive is the most comfortable, because it has the best headtracking, which means less motion sickness.

MobileVR will run on any smartphone you want, you dont' need a 1440p or even 1080P smartphone. It won't train any battery because it's connected to your PC/laptop via MicroUsb. Also I don't understand how games like GTA 5, Fallout 4 or Dark Souls 3 isn't considered "actual effects"


Like with any PC game, you will need different hardware for different games. Here is the 400$ PC I posted earlier:

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant


CPU: Intel Pentium G3258 3.2GHz Dual-Core Processor  ($65.99 @ SuperBiiz) 

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard  ($39.99 @ Newegg) 

Memory: Avexir Core Series 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1600 Memory  ($24.99 @ Newegg) 

Storage: Seagate Barracuda 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  ($45.89 @ OutletPC) 

Video Card: PowerColor Radeon R9 380 4GB PCS+ Video Card  ($172.99 @ Newegg) 

Case: Thermaltake VL80001W2Z ATX Mid Tower Case  ($24.99 @ Micro Center) 

Power Supply: Thermaltake TR2 500W ATX Power Supply  ($24.99 @ Newegg) 

Total: $399.83

Do you really believe you can just plug PCVR into any machine and make it work? Have you even bothered to read either the OR / Vives MINIMUM specs?

You keep strawmanning this whole concept of PSVR being all demos, but yet you think the quality of games that PCVR can run on your build wouldn't be demos?

Also, you forgot the OS that you LEGALLY need; you picked a horrible CPU; you are light on RAM; and you probably would want a better case.

And again -- now you are referring to hooking your mobile fun up to a computer which requires an actual gaming PC to run it. So we just circled back to it NOT being that cheap; and NOT that accessible for the mainstream.