That's simple.

1. Hardware specific optimization.
2. Pixel through put. OR uses 2560x1200@90 fps rendering 276 million pixels/second.
PSVR 1920x1080@60 fps (reprojection to 120 costs very little) rendering 124 million pixels/second. 45% of OR minimum needs.
3. Minecraft is horribly optimized, it struggles maintaining a decent fps on ps4 (When I use to many pistons and too much redstone, stuff breaks)

While actually the PSVR has slightly better subpixel density being full RGB instead of pentile (pretty much identical though, 1.25% more subpixels in psvr)

50% more powerful is not enough, at least twice is needed and probably more to maintain a locked fps on various hardware setups. The big advantage of fixed hardware is getting the most out of that hardware, while programming for various GPUs requires a healthy overhead to prevent dips below 90fps. The last thing you want in VR is screen tearing or judder.

And then you go on to showing us performance from multiplatform devs (small team aswell) showing how the performance is lower. Listen i am solely talking about the hardware here. If you want to show non-representative performance of the ps4 then be prepared to defend that statement.

There is a reason why Uncharted 4, Horizon and even Hellblade looks way better than The witcher 3. You are testing how the ps4 runs horrible software and and then saying it is representative. At least take the best of PS4 when you compare it to PC.

You are literally argueing AGAINST John Carmack. You know the guy who used the fast inverse square root calculation for video games.

The oculus Chief Technical Officer John Carmack.

If you honestly want to play Dark souls 3 at 60fps in VR then you will have a horrible time. The game is just not made for it and 60hz is horrible for VR. People are going to get SOOO sick playing that. I am not a troll. I am stating facts only.

A lame excuse and you have failed multiple times to back up your point, resorting to basically ad nauseaum fallacies. I noticed that whenever someone puts forth evidence that contradicts your claims, you never address the points and instead, switch to another topic.

Oh, and here's some more evidence that supports Areaz32's argument, though I won't expect you to actually address that either...

Aura7541 yeah that article does cooperate what i said. Not only that but Dr. Richard Marks said that it was an estimate from 3rd party devs. We all know first party devs get way more performance than 3rd party does.

There is a reason why Sony chose to use the move controllers again. The reason is that they are damn amazing. They are within milimeter accuracy. Just because someone tried a demo where the software was bad doesn't mean it has anything to do with the controllers.

The camera tracks the controllers at 2 times the refreshrate of the headset. ie. the camera goes at 240hz tracking on the controllers. So any disconnects between the controller and the game is 100% software based. It means the guys behind the software fucked up.

Yeah i felt it was getting a bit out of hand here. I have been looking around in these forums and i wasn't able to find any rules. I might just be really really blind but if it isn't too much to ask could you direct me to a rules section maybe? :D

It doesn't say anything like that.

You have no f* clue whatsoever.

THIS is the DK1

And THAT is a prototype HD DEVKIT

http://www.pcper.com/news/Displays/Oculus-VR-Rift-HD-1080p-Prototype-Headset-Impresses

The very same we see in this video...

https://youtu.be/kznm_qMR0-4

Mentioned by the same previewer in this video at 0:16...

https://youtu.be/z44mKwHav3w

"Can you explain to me why you need a 1000$ PC to run Minecraft or Skyrim in VR? Can you explain how a 400$ PC that's more then 50% more powerfull then the PS4 will get you motion sickness?"

There are a lot of things that need to be explained to you. But it doesn't seem your understanding is up to it.

God i feel stupid. Its right ontop of the page. Thanks anyway.

So I take it buying a premium device is always inferior to a cheap one?, man what was I thinking building my rig or spending money on expensive holidays all these years. That said I do expect price cuts in the future along with refinements.

The PSVR will be the cheapest alternative, of course. It won't be as high-end as the PC alternatives.

But the unit is aesthetically miles better than all the other sets. The other ones looks so bland and rough in comparison. They don't look like they're in their consumer iteration version compared to it.

But the look is secondary to the experience, that's for sure. Let's just hope that even though it is cheaper, the experiences won't suffer too much in comparison to the PC sets.