By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - (This is interesting) DF: Faster hard drives boost Xbox One Fallout 4 performance

walsufnir said:
ganoncrotch said:
walsufnir said:


A different storage shouldn't impact the fps that much. Faster loading times is common, better fps is not.


Did you read it? where in the article directly is it talking about the fps other than removing of the stuttering on the X1 which is a loading issue on taking out a weapon which is basically it being loaded into memory. You didn't ctrl C/V something without even reading it? or did I miss something?

Perhaps you missed the original article. There was evidence that the Xbone fall to 0 fps which led to a discussion how that is even possible and that PS4 was performing better. Of course it was quite obvious that the 0fps was because of a streaming problem and had nothing to do with processing units like the CPU or GPU but that didn't stop people confusing it with actual computing performance. Now that 0fps drop is gone by using different storage media.

I'm blaming DF for calling a short freeze 0fps.  It's obvious what is happening, the game freezes and waits for the content to load. If it is loaded faster before the game has to wait for it to process, the freeze doesn't happen. It is not related to performance but saying the game drops to 0fps gets a lot more attention. 



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Around the Network

Great information, very much needed. I just need to spend a lot of money on a ssd, thanks for that.



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.

Porcupine_I said:
walsufnir said:

Perhaps you missed the original article. There was evidence that the Xbone fall to 0 fps which led to a discussion how that is even possible and that PS4 was performing better. Of course it was quite obvious that the 0fps was because of a streaming problem and had nothing to do with processing units like the CPU or GPU but that didn't stop people confusing it with actual computing performance. Now that 0fps drop is gone by using different storage media.

I'm blaming DF for calling a short freeze 0fps.  It's obvious what is happening, the game freezes and waits for the content to load. If it is loaded faster before the game has to wait for it to process, the freeze doesn't happen. It is not related to performance but saying the game drops to 0fps gets a lot more attention. 


Looking at gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=210034, this seems to be effective.



Porcupine_I said:
walsufnir said:
ganoncrotch said:
walsufnir said:


A different storage shouldn't impact the fps that much. Faster loading times is common, better fps is not.


Did you read it? where in the article directly is it talking about the fps other than removing of the stuttering on the X1 which is a loading issue on taking out a weapon which is basically it being loaded into memory. You didn't ctrl C/V something without even reading it? or did I miss something?

Perhaps you missed the original article. There was evidence that the Xbone fall to 0 fps which led to a discussion how that is even possible and that PS4 was performing better. Of course it was quite obvious that the 0fps was because of a streaming problem and had nothing to do with processing units like the CPU or GPU but that didn't stop people confusing it with actual computing performance. Now that 0fps drop is gone by using different storage media.

I'm blaming DF for calling a short freeze 0fps.  It's obvious what is happening, the game freezes and waits for the content to load. If it is loaded faster before the game has to wait for it to process, the freeze doesn't happen. It is not related to performance but saying the game drops to 0fps gets a lot more attention. 

Well, if the game does not update the screen for a while (say 1 second), than effectively for that second we have 0FPS. No matter the cause, if the effect is that the graphics update suffers, it impacts the frames the game displays per second - and the performance of the game. 

I get it that drawing the next scene probably took far less than  seond, but that's not what the user sees, the user sees how many individual distinct frames the game draws on the screen in one second. If that is impacted (and short freezes impact that quite heavily) then what is percieved as the performance of the game suffers.

It's quite logical and straightforward.



What's the issue here? Something is causing the game to hitch and whatever it may be, it's still taking a hit out of the performance of the game. Just because it's an HDD related issue doesn't mean the performance issues get a pass. Until the game gets patched, the only way to alleviate the problem is to invest extra in an SSD, which is still unacceptable as troubleshooting at the moment.



Around the Network
RJ_Sizzle said:
What's the issue here? Something is causing the game to hitch and whatever it may be, it's still taking a hit out of the performance of the game. Just because it's an HDD related issue doesn't mean the performance issues get a pass. Until the game gets patched, the only way to alleviate the problem is to invest extra in an SSD, which is still unacceptable as troubleshooting at the moment.


Indeed, want the game to run smoothly on the X1, buy an SSD instead of the stock HDD installed in the console, would be a first for a console to require hardware updates to run a game smoothly (which otherwise runs, not including obvious stuff like eyetoy/ kinect required for games, since things need to be put in clear black and white to not garner a counter thread here).



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

So basically if you own a console it's time to upgrade it? Lol might as well just buy a PC.



method114 said:
So basically if you own a console it's time to upgrade it? Lol might as well just buy a PC.

A good gaming PC generally cost more than $350. Also, some PC ports are pretty much broken early on. Batman is still broken.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

I...yeah, duh. The game has serious loading issues on Xbox One.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Elite X1 it is then.