By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Should governments start regulating religion?

Scoobes on 31 August 2015
Johnw1104 said:
Sounds like a terrifying precedent and a potential endorsement of genocide.

I may not agree with much of the OP, but that's quite a big jump isn't it?




Get your Portable ID!

Around the Network
Dulfite on 31 August 2015
JWeinCom said:
Dulfite said:


And look what the Soviet Union did to it's people with the idea of no religion. Both sides are evil. Allowing people to have their beliefs and allowing them to be able to express them (individually, politically, etc) or NOT to is what the U.S. was founded upon. I don't want to be like Hitler Germany OR Soviet Union, I want to be us (as bad as that is at times, it is better than than other two).

Nonsense.  Nazi Germany was a Christian state with about 50 percent of its citizens being protestant, and 30 percent being catholic.  Regardless of the regimes personal beliefs (which we have no reason to believe were atheistic) they publicly used religion as a tool to motivate.  Books regarding evolution ("Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel) were on banned books.  The state endorsed religious instruction.  

I would not go so far as to say Naziism was a Christian movement, but it certainly was not atheistic, so do not imply that it is.

As for Soviet Russia, yes they were atheistic, although their position on religion changed at many points throughout it history.  Opposition to religion was largely based largely on the fact that the previous abusive regime was deeply interwoven with the Russian Orthodox Church.  

However, it is still nonsense to claim that Soviets did this to their people "with the idea of no religion".  The idea of no religion was ancillary to the communist movement.  The movement was about a system of economics and government, and not about religion.  You cannot say that what happened in Soviet Russia was due to atheism any more than I could say that World War 1 was caused by religion because most of the parties were religious.

I was saying Soviet Union was atheistic, not Nazi Germany. However, now that you bring it up, in no way shape or form was Nazi Germany related to Christianity. They can call it whatever they want, as many people do, but nothing about Nazi Germany reflected Christ's commands and guidance laid out for us in the New Testament. Would Christ have wanted Jews imprisoned, tortured, and killed? Would Christ have wanted people to be hated for what they looked like or what their background was? No. People can claim that they are Christian, but if their lifestyle is standing against what Christianity is all about (being more Christlike), then they are lying. That isn't to say Christians don't sin, but rather if someone claims to be a Christian and their entire lifestyle contradicts that, with no remorse, then they are lying to themselves and others.

Regardless of what you think the MAIN causes of Nazi Germany and Communist Soviet were, they were both led by people that either had an extremely twisted and distorted religious view or people that believed nothing. The actions that they committed, the persecution of people of faith (particularly Jews in both Germany and U.S.S.R) were terrible, terrible crimes that make them no different than modern North Korea, ISIS, and Boko Haram (I don't have the concern to look up how their pathetic organization is spelled so not sure if that is right). Because their actions were horrible, people will always look to what could have driven those actions into fruition, and belief systems are something people always look for when determing the cause behind atrocities and benevolence.



Teeqoz on 31 August 2015

No. What power religion has over the society is willingly given to it by society, and can only be taken from it by society (which is what is happening most places around the world).

The real problems with religion is when religion starts regulating the government.



bouzane on 31 August 2015

All organizations regardless of religious affiliation should pay taxes, I can see no valid argument against this. As far as policing goes the government has absolutely no right and should never become involved unless you were dealing with criminal or "terrorist" groups and that falls under other, pre-existing laws anyway.



alabtrosMyster on 31 August 2015

liberty of consciousness is something...That being said, you cannot do anything because it's encouraged by your religion, in decent modern countries religious texts are not recognised as source of law, because they are too arbitrary (even more than law itself, can you believe it).And I am not to tell people what they should believe or not, as long as they don't directly hurt someone, they can be as wrong as they want.

 



Around the Network
JWeinCom on 31 August 2015
Dulfite said:
JWeinCom said:

Nonsense.  Nazi Germany was a Christian state with about 50 percent of its citizens being protestant, and 30 percent being catholic.  Regardless of the regimes personal beliefs (which we have no reason to believe were atheistic) they publicly used religion as a tool to motivate.  Books regarding evolution ("Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel) were on banned books.  The state endorsed religious instruction.  

I would not go so far as to say Naziism was a Christian movement, but it certainly was not atheistic, so do not imply that it is.

As for Soviet Russia, yes they were atheistic, although their position on religion changed at many points throughout it history.  Opposition to religion was largely based largely on the fact that the previous abusive regime was deeply interwoven with the Russian Orthodox Church.  

However, it is still nonsense to claim that Soviets did this to their people "with the idea of no religion".  The idea of no religion was ancillary to the communist movement.  The movement was about a system of economics and government, and not about religion.  You cannot say that what happened in Soviet Russia was due to atheism any more than I could say that World War 1 was caused by religion because most of the parties were religious.

I was saying Soviet Union was atheistic, not Nazi Germany. However, now that you bring it up, in no way shape or form was Nazi Germany related to Christianity. They can call it whatever they want, as many people do, but nothing about Nazi Germany reflected Christ's commands and guidance laid out for us in the New Testament. Would Christ have wanted Jews imprisoned, tortured, and killed? Would Christ have wanted people to be hated for what they looked like or what their background was? No. People can claim that they are Christian, but if their lifestyle is standing against what Christianity is all about (being more Christlike), then they are lying. That isn't to say Christians don't sin, but rather if someone claims to be a Christian and their entire lifestyle contradicts that, with no remorse, then they are lying to themselves and others.

Regardless of what you think the MAIN causes of Nazi Germany and Communist Soviet were, they were both led by people that either had an extremely twisted and distorted religious view or people that believed nothing. The actions that they committed, the persecution of people of faith (particularly Jews in both Germany and U.S.S.R) were terrible, terrible crimes that make them no different than modern North Korea, ISIS, and Boko Haram (I don't have the concern to look up how their pathetic organization is spelled so not sure if that is right). Because their actions were horrible, people will always look to what could have driven those actions into fruition, and belief systems are something people always look for when determing the cause behind atrocities and benevolence.


In the context, I felt that you were implying that Nazi Germany was an atheist state.  If you weren't, then my bad.  As whether or not he was or was not a Christian in whatever sense you believe the word to mean isn't important.  What is, is whether or not Christianity was an influence, which I don't think we need to get into unless you'd like to.  And... I think you could make a pretty strong biblical case for torturing and killing Jews.  Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point that those who do not believe in Jesus (for instance the Jews) deserve eternal torture?  The bible is filled with the murder of non-believers in yahweh and jesus.  Do you believe the whole bible to be true, or just the nice turn the other cheek parts?

Anyway, this is the no true scotsman fallacy.  If whenever anybody takes actions based on their religion that you disapprove of, you brush it off by saying they're not true adherents of religion, then religion will come out looking squeaky clean.  However, when we consider, particularly in regards to Islam and Christianity, the frequency with which these religions are explicitly appealed to when attrocities are commited, then we should examine the religions closely to see if they are harmful, and if they are worth keeping around in the absence of any evidence.

Edit:  As a fair warning, I enjoy debating this issue and am absolutely trying to bait you :).  If you don't enjoy defending or debating your faith, then don't feel obligated to engage me.  



Dulfite on 01 September 2015
JWeinCom said:
Dulfite said:

I was saying Soviet Union was atheistic, not Nazi Germany. However, now that you bring it up, in no way shape or form was Nazi Germany related to Christianity. They can call it whatever they want, as many people do, but nothing about Nazi Germany reflected Christ's commands and guidance laid out for us in the New Testament. Would Christ have wanted Jews imprisoned, tortured, and killed? Would Christ have wanted people to be hated for what they looked like or what their background was? No. People can claim that they are Christian, but if their lifestyle is standing against what Christianity is all about (being more Christlike), then they are lying. That isn't to say Christians don't sin, but rather if someone claims to be a Christian and their entire lifestyle contradicts that, with no remorse, then they are lying to themselves and others.

Regardless of what you think the MAIN causes of Nazi Germany and Communist Soviet were, they were both led by people that either had an extremely twisted and distorted religious view or people that believed nothing. The actions that they committed, the persecution of people of faith (particularly Jews in both Germany and U.S.S.R) were terrible, terrible crimes that make them no different than modern North Korea, ISIS, and Boko Haram (I don't have the concern to look up how their pathetic organization is spelled so not sure if that is right). Because their actions were horrible, people will always look to what could have driven those actions into fruition, and belief systems are something people always look for when determing the cause behind atrocities and benevolence.


In the context, I felt that you were implying that Nazi Germany was an atheist state.  If you weren't, then my bad.  As whether or not he was or was not a Christian in whatever sense you believe the word to mean isn't important.  What is, is whether or not Christianity was an influence, which I don't think we need to get into unless you'd like to.  And... I think you could make a pretty strong biblical case for torturing and killing Jews.  Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point that those who do not believe in Jesus (for instance the Jews) deserve eternal torture?  The bible is filled with the murder of non-believers in yahweh and jesus.  Do you believe the whole bible to be true, or just the nice turn the other cheek parts?

Anyway, this is the no true scotsman fallacy.  If whenever anybody takes actions based on their religion that you disapprove of, you brush it off by saying they're not true adherents of religion, then religion will come out looking squeaky clean.  However, when we consider, particularly in regards to Islam and Christianity, the frequency with which these religions are explicitly appealed to when attrocities are commited, then we should examine the religions closely to see if they are harmful, and if they are worth keeping around in the absence of any evidence.

Edit:  As a fair warning, I enjoy debating this issue and am absolutely trying to bait you :).  If you don't enjoy defending or debating your faith, then don't feel obligated to engage me.  


I don't debate my faith, but I do try to clear up misconceptions that people have due to a multitude of things. If people are just trolling, then their is no missional point to talking to them as they won't believe you regardless and will just try to bring out the worst in you.

I like to break down things like this into points, so if you will indulge me...

1) A Christian is someone who follows Christ. Christ told his followers to love people, not kill them. Never once did HE command any of his followers to inflict harm upon people or to do anything to them that wasn't loving.

2) This is a concept that is hard, if not impossible, for an unbeliever to comprehend but I shall try to break it down. Under the Christian faith, there is God. It isn't good vs. evil (as the world tries to tell us), but rather God and, therefore, godliness. The absence of godliness is what we call sin. God is perfect, therefore HE cannot have sin, because sin is the opposite of HIS nature, as he is perfect and holy. We are all born into the sin (whether you are the Pope, John Piper, John McCarthur, C.S. Lewis, some random Mcdonalds worker, a stripper, or anyone else). We are born into something that is counter to God, because we do things that are imperfect. We don't always love, we often show hatred towards people (in actions and in thoughts), we commit adultry, we murder, we lie, etc. We are born into it because, originally, of the original sin with Adam and Eve. Even from our youth, we are selfish in nature (crying when we don't get what we want, trying to manipulate parents and others in order to get what we want). We are never innocent. God knew this, and HE didn't WANT us to be void of him, to be sin filled, and didn't want us to be separated from HIM forever, so HE sent HIS son Jesus Christ to live, die, and resurrect for us. HE has done all the hard work, it's just up to us whether or not we want to accept HIS forgiveness or not. HE isn't going to force people to believe in Christ as their savior (not until the end). Yes, eventually every knee will bow, and many will be cast into Hell but that is only because they CHOSE to NOT accept Jesus as their savior. At that point, there is no one to blame but yourself as you had ample opportunities to turn to Christ (as an adult Christian now, I marvel at how many things I see now that would have easily made me believe in Christ had I not been a beliver). We are intended to be with God, but if people chose to live without HIM through HIS son, then they are chosing hell themselves. I can't force someone to chose Christ, and I wouldn't want to either; you have to desire it yourself (as I did and continue to do).

3) Again, Christ never told us to harm others, that doesn't mean the Father doesn't have the right to. Yes, God punished people that turned away from HIM, but it always brought people back to HIM making them realize their need and love for HIM again. It's easy to, as a non believer, read randomly through the old testament, find verses that appear to contradict the Christian faith, and post about them online. Context is more important in the Bible than in any other book in history for understanding. God will do whatever it takes to make HIS love for us known, which often times makes people get out of their comfort zone by experiencing (what we perceive as) terrible things. I myself have experienced some terrible things in my life that I doubted God's purpose for, at the time. Now, years later, I see how it turned others to Christ and turned me more to God. If I can go through suffering that ultimately leads myself and others to either have an initial or growing relationship with Christ, then praise God!

4) Christianity isn't a status. You have to accept Christ and have your life turned around. It's not a club that you can just randomly join. When you accept Christ, HE changes your life. If your life doesn't change (Hitler) and produce fruit, then your lying to yourself about your faith. You either have Christ ruling your heart, or you don't. Hitler most certainly did not, therefore he is in no way representative of any form of authentic, Jesus loving, God fearing, Christianity.

5) There is nothing I enjoy about these conversations, unless they bring people to faith in Christ. It saddens me, as it does many, how something that appeared so foolish to me and other believers (before we believed), now is so sensible, and yet we cannot make it sensible to the unbelievers. It takes faith and with faith comes a greater understanding of what is REALLY going on.

1 Corinthians 2:14English Standard Version (ESV)

14 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.



JWeinCom on 02 September 2015
Dulfite said:
JWeinCom said:


In the context, I felt that you were implying that Nazi Germany was an atheist state.  If you weren't, then my bad.  As whether or not he was or was not a Christian in whatever sense you believe the word to mean isn't important.  What is, is whether or not Christianity was an influence, which I don't think we need to get into unless you'd like to.  And... I think you could make a pretty strong biblical case for torturing and killing Jews.  Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point that those who do not believe in Jesus (for instance the Jews) deserve eternal torture?  The bible is filled with the murder of non-believers in yahweh and jesus.  Do you believe the whole bible to be true, or just the nice turn the other cheek parts?

Anyway, this is the no true scotsman fallacy.  If whenever anybody takes actions based on their religion that you disapprove of, you brush it off by saying they're not true adherents of religion, then religion will come out looking squeaky clean.  However, when we consider, particularly in regards to Islam and Christianity, the frequency with which these religions are explicitly appealed to when attrocities are commited, then we should examine the religions closely to see if they are harmful, and if they are worth keeping around in the absence of any evidence.

Edit:  As a fair warning, I enjoy debating this issue and am absolutely trying to bait you :).  If you don't enjoy defending or debating your faith, then don't feel obligated to engage me.  


I don't debate my faith, but I do try to clear up misconceptions that people have due to a multitude of things. If people are just trolling, then their is no missional point to talking to them as they won't believe you regardless and will just try to bring out the worst in you.

I like to break down things like this into points, so if you will indulge me...

1) A Christian is someone who follows Christ. Christ told his followers to love people, not kill them. Never once did HE command any of his followers to inflict harm upon people or to do anything to them that wasn't loving.

2) This is a concept that is hard, if not impossible, for an unbeliever to comprehend but I shall try to break it down. Under the Christian faith, there is God. It isn't good vs. evil (as the world tries to tell us), but rather God and, therefore, godliness. The absence of godliness is what we call sin. God is perfect, therefore HE cannot have sin, because sin is the opposite of HIS nature, as he is perfect and holy. We are all born into the sin (whether you are the Pope, John Piper, John McCarthur, C.S. Lewis, some random Mcdonalds worker, a stripper, or anyone else). We are born into something that is counter to God, because we do things that are imperfect. We don't always love, we often show hatred towards people (in actions and in thoughts), we commit adultry, we murder, we lie, etc. We are born into it because, originally, of the original sin with Adam and Eve. Even from our youth, we are selfish in nature (crying when we don't get what we want, trying to manipulate parents and others in order to get what we want). We are never innocent. God knew this, and HE didn't WANT us to be void of him, to be sin filled, and didn't want us to be separated from HIM forever, so HE sent HIS son Jesus Christ to live, die, and resurrect for us. HE has done all the hard work, it's just up to us whether or not we want to accept HIS forgiveness or not. HE isn't going to force people to believe in Christ as their savior (not until the end). Yes, eventually every knee will bow, and many will be cast into Hell but that is only because they CHOSE to NOT accept Jesus as their savior. At that point, there is no one to blame but yourself as you had ample opportunities to turn to Christ (as an adult Christian now, I marvel at how many things I see now that would have easily made me believe in Christ had I not been a beliver). We are intended to be with God, but if people chose to live without HIM through HIS son, then they are chosing hell themselves. I can't force someone to chose Christ, and I wouldn't want to either; you have to desire it yourself (as I did and continue to do).

3) Again, Christ never told us to harm others, that doesn't mean the Father doesn't have the right to. Yes, God punished people that turned away from HIM, but it always brought people back to HIM making them realize their need and love for HIM again. It's easy to, as a non believer, read randomly through the old testament, find verses that appear to contradict the Christian faith, and post about them online. Context is more important in the Bible than in any other book in history for understanding. God will do whatever it takes to make HIS love for us known, which often times makes people get out of their comfort zone by experiencing (what we perceive as) terrible things. I myself have experienced some terrible things in my life that I doubted God's purpose for, at the time. Now, years later, I see how it turned others to Christ and turned me more to God. If I can go through suffering that ultimately leads myself and others to either have an initial or growing relationship with Christ, then praise God!

4) Christianity isn't a status. You have to accept Christ and have your life turned around. It's not a club that you can just randomly join. When you accept Christ, HE changes your life. If your life doesn't change (Hitler) and produce fruit, then your lying to yourself about your faith. You either have Christ ruling your heart, or you don't. Hitler most certainly did not, therefore he is in no way representative of any form of authentic, Jesus loving, God fearing, Christianity.

5) There is nothing I enjoy about these conversations, unless they bring people to faith in Christ. It saddens me, as it does many, how something that appeared so foolish to me and other believers (before we believed), now is so sensible, and yet we cannot make it sensible to the unbelievers. It takes faith and with faith comes a greater understanding of what is REALLY going on.

1 Corinthians 2:14English Standard Version (ESV)

14 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.


1.  According to Jesus-   For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. This means all of the old testament laws like stoning gay people to death, slavery, and so on still apply.  Also, do you believe that apostasy is an unforgivable sin and you will be tortured for all eternity if you deny Jesus?  Cause he certainly seems ok to torture people after death... forever.  So I don't see why torturing non-believers in life would be so abominable to him.

2.  "This is a concept that is hard, if not impossible, for an unbeliever to comprehend but I shall try to break it down. Under the Christian faith, there is God. It isn't good vs. evil (as the world tries to tell us), but rather God and, therefore, godliness." 

Nope... Good and evil are mentioned many times in the bible specifically. And, they're contrasted in the bible a bunch of times.

God is perfect, therefore HE cannot have sin, because sin is the opposite of HIS nature, as he is perfect and holy. 

So... nothing god does is a sin... and being like god is intrinsicly good right?  So killing Job's children to prove a point is good?  Flooding the entire world and killing babies, and animals who had nothing to with it is good?  God commanding the Israelites to murder every Midianite except for the virgins (wonder what they were supposed to do with them...) is good?  Killing people who worship idols (golden calf) is good?  Sending bears to kill people who insult a prophet is good?  Commanding you to kill your family if they worship other gods is good?  Torturing people for all eternity for a sin committed before they existed is good?

And yes I know this is old testament stuff, cause that's what I grew up with, but Jesus is quite clear on the fact that the god he describes is yahweh from the old testament.  

We are all born into the sin (whether you are the Pope, John Piper, John McCarthur, C.S. Lewis, some random Mcdonalds worker, a stripper, or anyone else).

Do you have any children?  If you did, would you look at your newborn baby and say "you are a sinner and deserve eternal torture"?  Because this is an absolutely disgusting idea, and it is not a surprise it leads to horrible results. Think of whoever you love most in the world.  If they didn't love you back, would you torture them forever?

We don't always love, we often show hatred towards people (in actions and in thoughts), we commit adultry, we murder, we lie, etc. We are born into it because, originally, of the original sin with Adam and Eve. Even from our youth, we are selfish in nature (crying when we don't get what we want, trying to manipulate parents and others in order to get what we want). 

Adam and Eve? So you take the genesis account literally?  Cause I mean... we're modern people in a modern world here and that story contradicts just about any information we've uncovered about our world.  If you take it as a metaphor, fine.  But literally? And what was their sin?  They ate from the tree of knowledge, before which they did not have any knowledge of good and evil.  They had know way of knowing whether or not what they were doing was a bad thing.  Their sin was not being blindly obedient.  Their sin was questioning god.  Apparently yahweh likes us stupid, amoral, and obedient.

And crying is evil?  You know what would happen to a baby that never cried?  That little kid would have an incredibly poor chance of survival. 

We are never innocent. God knew this, and HE didn't WANT us to be void of him, to be sin filled, and didn't want us to be separated from HIM forever, so HE sent HIS son Jesus Christ to live, die, and resurrect for us.

What did Jesus do?  How does god sacrificing himself to himself redeem me?  Personally, I wouldn't want another person to be sacrificed for something I did.  That's disgusting.  If you killed someone would it be ok for me to be imprisoned forever and get raped in the ass all day and you go free?  No.  That isn't justice.  That's sickening.

And if god wants us to be with him can't he just... you know... let us?  He's omnipotent and omniscient, yah?  Can't he figure out a better way then torturing an innocent person for something he didn't do?  Is yahweh just so messed up and revenge happy that he has to kill someone, no matter who it is?

HE isn't going to force people to believe in Christ as their savior (not until the end). Yes, eventually every knee will bow, and many will be cast into Hell but that is only because they CHOSE to NOT accept Jesus as their savior.

No.  I didn't choose anything.  There is no evidence to believe it, so I don't.  I can't believe that Jesus exists any more than I could believe that there are little green men on Jupiter.  Maybe they're there, but until there is some sort of evidence (neither preaching nor the bible counts) then I can't.  Not that I won't, I can't.  If you have some evidence though go for it.  But please don't confuse preaching with evidence. 

We are intended to be with God, but if people chose to live without HIM through HIS son, then they are chosing hell themselves. I can't force someone to chose Christ, and I wouldn't want to either; you have to desire it yourself (as I did and continue to do).

So those who don't believe in jesus deserve to be burned for all eternity?  Yet, hitler burning them in this world is somehow against the religion?  You can't torture them till they kick the bucket?  If we should be like yahweh, we should be torturing non-believers.  Hell, we're commanded to.  

3. Again, Christ never told us to harm others, that doesn't mean the Father doesn't have the right to.

Wait... so there is no evil... just godliness... as in doing what god does... And god is jesus...  and jesus is perfect and therefore as godly as can be...so we should be godly by not harming others because jesus doesn't do it... but we should harm people because god does...  huh...

yahweh has some wacky split personality thing going.  That's like saying it's wrong for Peter Parker to kill someone, but Spider-man is allowed. 

Yes, God punished people that turned away from HIM, but it always brought people back to HIM making them realize their need and love for HIM again.

How does being tortured in hell forever make them love him?  This sounds like an abusive boyfriend.  Love me or else.  You are worthless without me.  Right out of the abusive spouse handbook.  You should not fear someone you love.

It's easy to, as a non believer, read randomly through the old testament, find verses that appear to contradict the Christian faith, and post about them online. 

Yeah... because the book is disgusting and yahweh's actions are disgusting.  

Context is more important in the Bible than in any other book in history for understanding. 

First of all, no.  Context is equally important in any book.  There is no reason to give special consideration to the bible. But if context is so important, explain to me in what context enslaving the heathens around you is.  Also please explain the context where killing the entire population of a city but keeping the virgins alive is ok in context.  

4.   Ah... so anyone who does good things because of their belief in christ is divinely inspired.  Anyone who doesn't is just a liar liar pants on fire.  Pretty sweet win win situation you've constructed. 

When your belief system states that certain people are so terrible (for not believing in something) that they deserve to be tortured forever, do you not see how this would lead to people being looked down on or even to be the subject of harm?  You cannot respect someone while thinking they deserve eternal punishment.

5.  Faith is a terrible terrible thing.  Faith is believing something without any good reason to.  Faith, be it faith to an infallible state, an infallible leader, an infallible philosopy, is the common denominator in all the things you've mentioned.  Faith in hitler, faith in stalin, faith in hirohito, faith in god, faith in jesus, faith in allah, faith in the motherland, etc.  Believing in anything without question and without evidence in inherently a bad thing.

Name one other area in which faith is a good thing?  Not trust, which is belief with good reason (for example my girlfiend has always been honest so I trust she's not cheating on me), but faith.  In what other aspect of our lives is faith a good thing?  If faith is not a good thing in any other aspect of our lives, why should we use it here?

So if you want people to see the light, just prove it.  Show atheists objective evidence and we'll be happy to believe.  Living forever would kick ass, and I'm certainy not opposed to it.  But I can't believe things without evidence.

"It is an insult to God to believe in God. For on the one hand it is to suppose that he has perpetrated acts of incalculable cruelty. On the other, it is to suppose that he has perversely given his human creatures an instrument -- their intellect -- which must inevitably lead them, if they are dispassionate and honest, to deny his existence. It is tempting to conclude that if he exists, it is the atheists and agnostics that he loves best, among those with any pretensions to education. For they are the ones who have taken him most seriously." -- Galen Strawson



teamsilent13 on 02 September 2015

Religious institiutions in general exist under extreme tight budgets that rely on voluntary donations from already taxed citizens. 



LivingMetal on 02 September 2015
Dulfite said:
JWeinCom said:


In the context, I felt that you were implying that Nazi Germany was an atheist state.  If you weren't, then my bad.  As whether or not he was or was not a Christian in whatever sense you believe the word to mean isn't important.  What is, is whether or not Christianity was an influence, which I don't think we need to get into unless you'd like to.  And... I think you could make a pretty strong biblical case for torturing and killing Jews.  Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the point that those who do not believe in Jesus (for instance the Jews) deserve eternal torture?  The bible is filled with the murder of non-believers in yahweh and jesus.  Do you believe the whole bible to be true, or just the nice turn the other cheek parts?

Anyway, this is the no true scotsman fallacy.  If whenever anybody takes actions based on their religion that you disapprove of, you brush it off by saying they're not true adherents of religion, then religion will come out looking squeaky clean.  However, when we consider, particularly in regards to Islam and Christianity, the frequency with which these religions are explicitly appealed to when attrocities are commited, then we should examine the religions closely to see if they are harmful, and if they are worth keeping around in the absence of any evidence.

Edit:  As a fair warning, I enjoy debating this issue and am absolutely trying to bait you :).  If you don't enjoy defending or debating your faith, then don't feel obligated to engage me.  


I don't debate my faith, but I do try to clear up misconceptions that people have due to a multitude of things. If people are just trolling, then their is no missional point to talking to them as they won't believe you regardless and will just try to bring out the worst in you...


"And if anyone will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet when you leave that house or town."  -Matthew 10:14