Samus Aran said:
That's not true, all the big prestigious franchises (i.e not new IPs) have gotten very high reviews this year: Bloodborne (spiritual succesor), TW3 and MGS5. They're hard to impress when it comes to games like 2D platformers, but they lose all critical thought when they're reviewing prestigious open world games. If a 2D or 3D platformer ever shipped with as many bugs and glitches as Skyrim it would be sitting at a 50-60% meta. Skyrim is GOTY though. ;) I'm sure Uncharted 4, Zelda U and Fallout 4 will easily get over 90% as well. Even a big turd like Skyward Sword got a ridiculously high score. I can't be arsed to go over all the flaws of Skyward Sword, so I'll just post this review:
93% my ass. |
Probably you didn't see my post when I said that until now, I thought it was impossible to score at least 95 this gen and MGS proved me wrong. I mean look at this:
Last gen: GTA 4, LBP 1, orange box, Gears of war 1, bioshock 1, mario galaxy 1, zelda TP, COD 4 MW, MGS 4: everyone one of them had at least 94 on meta in almost similar period (only took games until 2008).
current gen: MGS 5 (only one that have at least 94).
I went from 95 to 94 and still can only find one game this gen that have that score, that's why I said it's more difficult to impressed them now compare to the beginning of last gen. I didn't say reviewer don't give good score. there are obviously some 92 and 93 this current gen but they are nowhere near as much as last gen in the same time period.
Edit: just in case, always meant in comparison to last gen.