By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - One of the main problems of MS' first party games

Jazz2K said:
I always considered great graphics as a plus feature but not an absolute necessity. Especially if it minimises gameplay and replay value. MS games have nice graphics and most of them sport replay value like no Sony game can offer. But I think cheerleaders from both camps have a different mindset and like their games differently. Ofc it's my opinion but Xbox gamers value multiplay and replayability while Sony gamers prefer storytelling, presentation and graphics. This is how I always viewed things especially when reading comments for many years but it doesn't mean it's true, just my personal observation.

I agree though that MS first party studios should be able to make new IPs.


Reading this post, it's like you equate Naughty Dog to Sony's first party (Great graphic, focus on storytelling). Also, in nearly every case, graphics doesn't minimize the gameplay from Sony's 1st party. Besides, Sony has tons of first party games that have plenty of replay value (And great gameplay).

Also, is there any MS game that sports replay value on the level of Ratchet & Clank?

 



Around the Network

This thread became so boring



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

AG80 said:

Where are you getting these calculations from? Guerilla does have two different teams, I'm talking about their Amsterdam studio. Horizon was probably conceptualized in 2010 and began development early in 2011. So about 5 years of development, which is par for the course for an open-world game..

Guerilla Amsterdam has 1 team with multiple concepts in flux as any studio would. They make 1 game every 3 years, thats one studio. They start making 2 games every 3 years, they're a 2 game studio.

Development for KZ: SF began in early 2011, it's in the link I showed you.

A few months before Killzone 3 launched in February 2011 its designers began working on the follow-up - what would eventually become Shadow Fall.

That same link is Geurillas announcing - a few months before KZ:DF launched - they were working on a new IP, they didn't announce this in 2009.

AG80 said:

There are no "signs" of anything. And they can't foresee something which is entirely based on opinions.

KZ3 scored less than KZ2 and didn't sell appreciably better. If it continued that way, somethings gotta change. It did continue with Shadow Fall, something changed.

AG80 said:

You completely ignored what I said. In 2 years Halo also fell by just as much as Uncharted, and from a lower score to begin with. If you're gonna talk about lifetime Uncharted increased from 88 to 92 in 4 years.

Not really, i said Halo 4 sold like Halo and kept in line with the meta depreciation of Reach despite changing studios. It's not like Halo 4 hasn't taken its knocks.

Uncharted 3 neither sold like Halo 4 and had a steeper depreciation, no change of studio either. Bear in mind GT5 wasn't performing on par with GT4 (not even close) a year before in sales or scores, Uncharted got accidentaly bumped up to the great Playstation hope and was stumbling. It's no surprise Sony might want to branch out.

AG80 said:

 If you're gonna talk about lifetime Uncharted increased from 88 to 92 in 4 years.

It did, but the first wasn't particularly remarkable was it.

sasquatchmontana said:

How is Sony carting it off to die? It has a sequel in development, doesn't seem it will cart off to die anytime soon.

Because they've said its the last one?  Probably meta 87% (same drop off as Arkham Knight). Best case scenario it sells as much as the last 2. Everything else is downhill from there.

sasquatchmontana said:

And one game scoring meh doesn't make Killzone a meh franchise,  one game which btw was constrained by a system launch.

The original was no sweetheart, 2 was much improved, 3 was problematic and SF was meh.

That right there is 10 years of Killzone, that is a lot of time and effort for a franchise that did maybe around 10-11 million on consoles. Ask Sony if they could have another franchise that does 25 million in 7 years or...they could have another Killzone...its a simple choice. Ensured mediocrity or possible greatness.

AG80 said:

Bullshit. You're just taking numbers out of your ass here. Forza 4 sold just a little more tahn 3 million, F2 didn't sell 4 million, F3 was the peak of the franchise due to excessive bundling.

Eh, i'm just reiterating what Forzas community manager has said. I'm well aware F2 & 3 were bundled so the figures are inflated, it's main competitor Gran Turimo did no less, so did Uncharted.

AG80 said:

Yet Microsoft goes even farther with Fable.

People are smart. They know that Journey was a spin-off, Anniversary was a remake and Heroes was an XBLA game. Fable III was their Killzone 3, likely Fable Legends will be their KZ:SF. Lionheads been concepting a new IP for a year now. They can see it coming too. Unlike you I have no problems acknowleging this.

AG80 said:

LBP sold 5 million +, Uncharted routinely sells 6 million +, the very basis of your claim is wrong. H

Not really. all I'm saying is Uncharted is being bumped off because Sonys financial issues put the kibosh on Naughty Dog becoming 2 teams, their plans in 2011 were to make Uncharted and TloU alternately.

These plans fell apart with Uncharted 3's qualititive issues and TLoU 6 month delay into 2013...which may well have caused Uncharted 4's 6 month delay as well.

So its one or the other, TLoU resonated better in the USA in a June launch then any Uncharted has during the holidays, it had a higher meta score then Uncharted 3, and has suffered less IP fatigue. In the long term, its more advantageous to Sony to ditch it.

AG80 said:

 LBP 3 wasn't even developed by Sony's first-party but outsourced to a third-party developer.

Yep and for a mainline sequel, being outsourced is hardly having much faith.

 

 



DerNebel said:
I've been verarscht. I'm outta here.


Unverschämtheit.



I think the XB1 Line-up of games are doomed because of the market their console appeals to the most, it's not easy to change direction when they did so well with third-party support, shooters and sports game last generation, that it have made a such impact on it's core-fan-base that grew up with the 360 as it's first and only console through the last 10 years that they are barely interested in any other type of games because people rarely manage to break off from habits unless some incredible force really manage to push them off the cliff that they got stuck on.
The XB360 from the start aimed towards the Casual market and that is exactly what they got, Ps3 did get a following in the casual market as well but as we all know, the diversity on the Ps1-Ps2 and Ps3 gained a solid market and Sony lost billions by taking all these risks in their attempts to save the Ps3.. I do think Xb1 is heading the same way and if Microsoft steps out of the comfort Zone with the dudebro gamers, they will loose even more profits then Sony did with the Ps3. Nintendo have played it safe for 17 years now but got lucky on the gimmicks and how they presented it..

It's not good to be a gamer when the demands for games are higher with the casual market, because diversity will take a hit.



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

Around the Network
binary solo said:
LordLichtenstein said:
My biggest "problem" is, that many of their top tier studios don't have any freedom.

343 Industries - Halo Studio

The Coalition - Gears of War Studio

Turn 10 Studios - Forza Motorsport Studio

Playground Games - Forza Horizon Studio

Sony has it's examples. Most notably with GT, but maybe Polyphony loves sim racers and GT so much they don't want to branch out. But still, I think if Poly could bring in a bit of extra talent and release a counter-cyclical kart racer that would be a pretty good move. Maybe they should salvage the key people who worked on MNR and get moving on that idea. I prefer kart racers over all other forms of racer, so yeah, get on it Sony.

The head of Polyphony is obsessed with making the perfect racing sim. GT is a very historically important franchise worldwide for Sony. Truthfully Sony has nothing to prove compared to Microsoft about being able to create their own diverse first party.



S.T.A.G.E. said:
binary solo said:

Sony has it's examples. Most notably with GT, but maybe Polyphony loves sim racers and GT so much they don't want to branch out. But still, I think if Poly could bring in a bit of extra talent and release a counter-cyclical kart racer that would be a pretty good move. Maybe they should salvage the key people who worked on MNR and get moving on that idea. I prefer kart racers over all other forms of racer, so yeah, get on it Sony.

The head of Polyphony is obsessed with making the perfect racing sim. GT is a very historically important franchise worldwide for Sony. Truthfully Sony has nothing to prove compared to Microsoft about being able to create their own diverse first party.

 

It was the most important Sony exclusive for years and nothing less. Uncharted *could* change that but still until today GT is the "mascot" of the Playstation.



sasquatchmontana said:
AG80 said:

Where are you getting these calculations from? Guerilla does have two different teams, I'm talking about their Amsterdam studio. Horizon was probably conceptualized in 2010 and began development early in 2011. So about 5 years of development, which is par for the course for an open-world game..

Guerilla Amsterdam has 1 team with multiple concepts in flux as any studio would. They make 1 game every 3 years, thats one studio. They start making 2 games every 3 years, they're a 2 game studio.

Development for KZ: SF began in early 2011, it's in the link I showed you.

A few months before Killzone 3 launched in February 2011 its designers began working on the follow-up - what would eventually become Shadow Fall.

That same link is Geurillas announcing - a few months before KZ:DF launched - they were working on a new IP, they didn't announce this in 2009.

No output of a studio has nothing to do with how many teams they have. Their second teamhad been working on the same IP for years so they obviously could not have had any better output. And games aren't announced right when they begin development, it just doesn't make sense to do so.

AG80 said:

There are no "signs" of anything. And they can't foresee something which is entirely based on opinions.

KZ3 scored less than KZ2 and didn't sell appreciably better. If it continued that way, somethings gotta change. It did continue with Shadow Fall, something changed.

What you're saying has no relation to metacritic, no ne can forsee the scores their game would get in metacritic. There could have been no signs of anything till Shadow Fall actually came out.

AG80 said:

You completely ignored what I said. In 2 years Halo also fell by just as much as Uncharted, and from a lower score to begin with. If you're gonna talk about lifetime Uncharted increased from 88 to 92 in 4 years.

Not really, i said Halo 4 sold like Halo and kept in line with the meta depreciation of Reach despite changing studios. It's not like Halo 4 hasn't taken its knocks.

Uncharted 3 neither sold like Halo 4 and had a steeper depreciation, no change of studio either. Bear in mind GT5 wasn't performing on par with GT4 (not even close) a year before in sales or scores, Uncharted got accidentaly bumped up to the great Playstation hope and was stumbling. It's no surprise Sony might want to branch out.

Lol WTFare you saying, Halo Reach - 4 and Uncharted 2 - 3 had the same amount of depreciation (4 points on metacritic) even though Halo Reach was already much lower than Uncharted 2 (even Uncharted 3). And why the fuck does Uncharted need to sell like Halo to continue? It was never selling like Halo to begin with. GT sells like Halo, Sony doesn't need two franchises as big as Halo.

AG80 said:

 If you're gonna talk about lifetime Uncharted increased from 88 to 92 in 4 years.

It did, but the first wasn't particularly remarkable was it.

YYes it was, it took the gaming world by storm. It was one of the most innovative shooters of its time. Thing is, Uncharted evolved rapidly cause Naughty Dog wanted to improve further over what they already acieve, and not be lazy and make the series stagnant like Bungie and now 343i.

sasquatchmontana said:

How is Sony carting it off to die? It has a sequel in development, doesn't seem it will cart off to die anytime soon.

Because they've said its the last one?  Probably meta 87% (same drop off as Arkham Knight). Best case scenario it sells as much as the last 2. Everything else is downhill from there.

Ok, this is another one of those statements where you're taking numbers out of your ass.

sasquatchmontana said:

And one game scoring meh doesn't make Killzone a meh franchise,  one game which btw was constrained by a system launch.

The original was no sweetheart, 2 was much improved, 3 was problematic and SF was meh.

That right there is 10 years of Killzone, that is a lot of time and effort for a franchise that did maybe around 10-11 million on consoles. Ask Sony if they could have another franchise that does 25 million in 7 years or...they could have another Killzone...its a simple choice. Ensured mediocrity or possible greatness.

3 was great, not realy "problematic". And you know, if Sony had this mentality, none f their niche games would have existed and neither would GT and God Of War. I'm glad Sony doesn't have this kind of mentality, I don't want them to be MS.

AG80 said:

Bullshit. You're just taking numbers out of your ass here. Forza 4 sold just a little more tahn 3 million, F2 didn't sell 4 million, F3 was the peak of the franchise due to excessive bundling.

Eh, i'm just reiterating what Forzas community manager has said. I'm well aware F2 & 3 were bundled so the figures are inflated, it's main competitor Gran Turimo did no less, so did Uncharted.

GT sold well even wiithout bundling, Forza did not. And the community manager never went into depth about how much each title sold, you're just pulling out bullshit numbers that you made up. All we have is VGC sales data and it clearly indicates a decline for the franchise since FM3.

AG80 said:

Yet Microsoft goes even farther with Fable.

People are smart. They know that Journey was a spin-off, Anniversary was a remake and Heroes was an XBLA game. Fable III was their Killzone 3, likely Fable Legends will be their KZ:SF. Lionheads been concepting a new IP for a year now. They can see it coming too. Unlike you I have no problems acknowleging this.

Except Killzone 3 had a higher metascore than Fable III.

AG80 said:

LBP sold 5 million +, Uncharted routinely sells 6 million +, the very basis of your claim is wrong. H

Not really. all I'm saying is Uncharted is being bumped off because Sonys financial issues put the kibosh on Naughty Dog becoming 2 teams, their plans in 2011 were to make Uncharted and TloU alternately.

These plans fell apart with Uncharted 3's qualititive issues and TLoU 6 month delay into 2013...which may well have caused Uncharted 4's 6 month delay as well.

So its one or the other, TLoU resonated better in the USA in a June launch then any Uncharted has during the holidays, it had a higher meta score then Uncharted 3, and has suffered less IP fatigue. In the long term, its more advantageous to Sony to ditch it.

Uh...what qualititative issues did Uncharted 3 have? It scored a damn amazing 92 on metacritic, sold over 6 million units and made a huge fanbase worldwide. USA matters little, its wordlwide sales that matter and Uncharted is sells extremely well, though I can see that TLOU has sold better, if they really wanted to ditch it Uncharted 4 would not have been made.

AG80 said:

 LBP 3 wasn't even developed by Sony's first-party but outsourced to a third-party developer.

Yep and for a mainline sequel, being outsourced is hardly having much faith.

Yes and that's what I'm saying, it started out better than Uncharted but LBP hasn't grown or continued to have a large fanbase. That's why first game in an IP doesn't matter all that much, its how you nuture and grow the IP which matters.

 





walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
binary solo said:

Sony has it's examples. Most notably with GT, but maybe Polyphony loves sim racers and GT so much they don't want to branch out. But still, I think if Poly could bring in a bit of extra talent and release a counter-cyclical kart racer that would be a pretty good move. Maybe they should salvage the key people who worked on MNR and get moving on that idea. I prefer kart racers over all other forms of racer, so yeah, get on it Sony.

The head of Polyphony is obsessed with making the perfect racing sim. GT is a very historically important franchise worldwide for Sony. Truthfully Sony has nothing to prove compared to Microsoft about being able to create their own diverse first party.

 

It was the most important Sony exclusive for years and nothing less. Uncharted *could* change that but still until today GT is the "mascot" of the Playstation.

Indeed but I'd say TLOU has a better chance of doing taht than Uncharted. Horizon also has the potential to do it.



AG80 said:
walsufnir said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
binary solo said:

Sony has it's examples. Most notably with GT, but maybe Polyphony loves sim racers and GT so much they don't want to branch out. But still, I think if Poly could bring in a bit of extra talent and release a counter-cyclical kart racer that would be a pretty good move. Maybe they should salvage the key people who worked on MNR and get moving on that idea. I prefer kart racers over all other forms of racer, so yeah, get on it Sony.

The head of Polyphony is obsessed with making the perfect racing sim. GT is a very historically important franchise worldwide for Sony. Truthfully Sony has nothing to prove compared to Microsoft about being able to create their own diverse first party.

 

It was the most important Sony exclusive for years and nothing less. Uncharted *could* change that but still until today GT is the "mascot" of the Playstation.

Indeed but I'd say TLOU has a better chance of doing taht than Uncharted. Horizon also has the potential to do it.


Oh, perhaps you got me wrong ;) With Uncharted, I meant Drake. I guess Uncharted in general has a better chance of a mass appeal for masses than TLOU. I don't say it's because the game is better but I feel it "fits" better as it is a "funnier" game with its setting than some apocalyptic scenario.

Horizon? How do you think this could be iconic to Playstation?