By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Sony + Nintendo Have A Deal For a Super Mario Movie

Metallox said:
DanneSandin said:

Yeah, but that wasn't Nintendo, now was it? Retro knows how to write a good story, but I'm not too sure Nintendo can write an entire movie by themselves. Granted, Skyward Sword had great chemistry between Link and Zelda, so maybe there's hope.

Anywways, regarding your other post: "Mario is as interesting as a brick. His games are good, but Mario the character sucks and always has." That's the point though. I don't think Sony can make THAT character interesting! I would much rather have seen Mario done by Pixar. They can make good characters without hardly having a diolouge; Up and Wall-e comes to mind.

You can hire writers. 

Do you mean Nintendo could hire writers, or that Sony could? Both are true, but going by Sony's past ventures into animated movies, they haven't done a great job.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

Around the Network
DevilRising said:

No offense, but I really think that Sony/Microsoft, or at least their gaming divisions, would collapse long before Nintendo ever will. They've got their issues, but as long as people love their games, people will also buy their consoles to play them. And if the rumors about their future system being a portable/home unit hybrid (basically just furthering the design that Wii U and it's GamePad started already), then they'd have one unified system down the road anyway, so less investment/risk. I think they'll be around, as a console maker, for as long as the video game industry itself lasts. Not saying I couldn't be wrong, but I really don't see them collapsing.

Depends on their next hardware. But Nintendo has been failing IMHO as a hardware manufacturer. Inb4 Wii sales. Its clear what carries them are their IPs. A stable of incredibly strong IPs granted but I think they could make more money financially focusing on software, peripherals and what not. I think Amibo could be huge, even a game changer. Let the other guys compete in the hardware space, let Nintendo focus on their bread and butter



Now I am interested. Animated movie is something I've wanted for Mario for a long time,but wouldve preferred Pixar :(

 

however I feel like  this after seeing this news(if true)

 



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

DanneSandin said:
Metallox said:
DanneSandin said:

Yeah, but that wasn't Nintendo, now was it? Retro knows how to write a good story, but I'm not too sure Nintendo can write an entire movie by themselves. Granted, Skyward Sword had great chemistry between Link and Zelda, so maybe there's hope.

Anywways, regarding your other post: "Mario is as interesting as a brick. His games are good, but Mario the character sucks and always has." That's the point though. I don't think Sony can make THAT character interesting! I would much rather have seen Mario done by Pixar. They can make good characters without hardly having a diolouge; Up and Wall-e comes to mind.

You can hire writers. 

Do you mean Nintendo could hire writers, or that Sony could? Both are true, but going by Sony's past ventures into animated movies, they haven't done a great job.

Well, that's true :/



My bet with The_Liquid_Laser: I think the Switch won't surpass the PS2 as the best selling system of all time. If it does, I'll play a game of a list that The_Liquid_Laser will provide, I will have to play it for 50 hours or complete it, whatever comes first. 

Sony has done Hotel Transylvania and The Smurfs right? I'm not sure what else they've done.

Thing is their CG movies have been quite profitable:

Hotel Transylvania = $385 million global box office off a $85 million budget. 

The Smurfs = $562 million global box office ($110 mill budget)

The Smurfs 2 = $347 million global box office ($105 mill budget)

If a Mario movie performs similiarly to any of those, I'd have to think Mario 2/3 movies will be greenlit fairly quickly. It's not like any of the above films were that good. If Mario is decent I think it could earn $380-$500 million globally. 

If it's a really good movie though I think you're talking a biiiiig movie franchise with box office north of $600 million. 

Nintendo was quite hands on with Bowser being in Wreck It Ralph too, right? I wonder if this means no Mario in Wreck It Ralph 2? 



Around the Network
SwooshX said:

Sony has done Hotel Transylvania and The Smurfs right? I'm not sure what else they've done.

Thing is their CG movies have been quite profitable:

Hotel Transylvania = $385 million global box office off a $85 million budget. 

The Smurfs = $562 million global box office ($110 mill budget)

The Smurfs 2 = $347 million global box office ($105 mill budget)

If a Mario movie performs similiarly to any of those, I'd have to think Mario 2/3 movies will be greenlit fairly quickly. It's not like any of the above films were that good. If Mario is decent I think it could earn $380-$500 million globally. 

If it's a really good movie though I think you're talking a biiiiig movie franchise with box office north of $600 million. 

Nintendo was quite hands on with Bowser being in Wreck It Ralph too, right? I wonder if this means no Mario in Wreck It Ralph 2? 

They've done Cloudy with a chance of Meatballs as well. Think that was pretty profitable and had a sequel. Transylvania is getting a sequel as well. But you gotta remember that the smurf is part live action as well.

I'd much rather see Mario in the hands of a company that makes GREAT animated movies; Disney have done Wreck it Ralph and Frozen, Pixar (part of Disney) have done Up, the Incredibles and much more, and Dreamworks have done Kung Fu Panda. All of those movies are VERY profitable and even acclaimed titles. THAT'S what Mario and Nintendo needs.

Hotel Transylvania and The Smurf didn't get all that much praise....



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

I'm not sure Pixar would even want to do a Mario movie ... if they were going to do a movie with a licensed/pre-existing property I suspect they'd rather go for Star Wars, Marvel, or one of Disney's legacy characters like Mickey/Donald etc.

Oh well. I think Mario could be bigger than the Smurfs, and those movies were fairly awful.

Maybe Nintendo chose Sony as well not only because they are Japanese but because if they have a concern they feel more at home taking their concerns to the top with a guy like Kaz Hirai who comes from the game industry. They might feel maybe he would understand Mario more than some American Hollywood studio head.



aLkaLiNE said:
This is awesome news if true although I'm somewhat weary.

Should Nintendo collapse (god forbid) then I think it's wise for Sony to preemptively form a healthy relationship with the house that Mario built.

Honestly, who wouldn't wet themselves over Super Smash Bros PS6?


Or if Sony falls into hard times again, lets be honest, Nintendo are the most likely company to try and salavage their still useful Entertainment section. - It'd be wise either way...  but I sincerely doubt its true. Though it is interesting it comes out shortly after the Pikmin stuff. 

 

 

Kratos and Sackboy in Smash for Hyper Nintendo and Smash for Game&Phone still seems unlikely though.



This is going to end so well......



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

I'll be waiting and sees how it goes ... kkkkkkk



Prediction: Nintendo Switch sells 100 million until the end of 2021