ethomaz said:
Veknoid_Outcast said: I've yet to play Destiny, so please take my thoughts with a boulder of salt, but all the fallout from Destiny has seriously damaged the high level of respect I've held for Bungie for years. I'll always love Bungie for bringing the world Halo: Combat Evolved, arguably the single best FPS ever made, and the Halo series it spawned, arguably the single best FPS series ever. But Bungie has really screwed the pooch with Destiny, especially if it's true that large sections of the base game were removed to sell later as DLC. I guess you can blame Activision for on-disc DLC, for the outrageously expensive advertising budget, for all the slimy business practices, but in the end Bungie got into bed with Activision. |
I guess you need to play it first
The game have flaws but there are not that big like people that had unbeliable high expectations believes so... it is a so fun and addictive that make you don't want to play another game ever.
And it is a new way to for FPS... it is to be a game per generation with content reching the game each some months... so it will get bigger and better every month and more gamers will enjoy it.
There are new big events too... the next is the Iron Banner to happen in early October (it just didn't happened before because Iron Banner releaes the level and gears bonus status in PVP and Bungie wanted that you reach a good level before do the event).
The game is solid and great.
|
Yes, I do need to play it. But I can't justify $60 for a game with so many question marks.
In any event, my stance on on-disc DLC and incomplete games stands: it's unacceptable. Bungie and Activision deserve to be censured for those cynical business practices, if true, regardless of the game's quality.
In other words, my complaint has more to do with reports of on-disc DLC and of Activison and Bungie selling Destiny piece by piece, and less about the game's quality, about which I have zero first-hand experience.