bubblegamer said:
THIS is the comment you choose to show that people have gone far in your eyes? |
I dont see anyone bashing the game itself. Its just that they dont see much of a difference.
bubblegamer said:
THIS is the comment you choose to show that people have gone far in your eyes? |
I dont see anyone bashing the game itself. Its just that they dont see much of a difference.
bubblegamer said:
|
Huh? Where am i angry?
Well what do you expect to read? 'Wow great ND have outdone themselves again!'? Thats not going to happen on a one year old remake.
You seem to be asking for positive feedback only, but thats never going to happen, especially not with a controversial game like this (not because of the game, but because of the early remake of course!)
Im pretty sure you knew before that this thread wont get all that much positive feedback, so i dont know why you're so surprised (atleast it seems so!).
If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)
VanceIX said: It's more to do with the fact that this is an obvious money-grab by Sony. Instead of remaking or remastering some older games which a lot people haven't had access to in a while, they remaster a one year old game and only marginally improve on it. It gets them the most money, sure, but it doesn't change the fact that it's a dubious corporate decision. |
How is that dubiuous? If it gets them the most money, then obviously it's what the most people want. How is it wrong to give their fanbase something they've been asking for? It's a big resolution and framerate increase, and it looks like an improvement to the physics as well. If you aren't interested that's fine, but it doesn't make anyone evil.
bubblegamer said:
THIS is the comment you choose to show that people have gone far in your eyes? |
Yeah. Because being sarcastic and claiming there's no difference isn't breaking rules; generalizing fanbases is.
There's no real need for it after all.
KLXVER said:
|
Exactly what im thinking lol.
No one is bashing anything, its just their opinion, which is fine.
If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)
bubblegamer said:
THIS is the comment you choose to show that people have gone far in your eyes? |
You're attacking a fanbase for stating their opinions.
Really? Are we comparing almost entirely untouched cutscenes again? :p
The right one looks a lot clearer and the textures are better defined thanks to the added clarity. That's about it. This may as well be a comparison for 720p vs 1080p, since that and the frame rate are 99% of what's been changed in the cutscenes.
jlmurph2 said:
|
No because you can't see 1080p below 60 inches. Or at least that's what your blind overlords say.
bubblegamer said: THIS is the comment you choose to show that people have gone far in your eyes? |
You were interfering with people's freedom to troll. That kind of behavior is unacceptable.
OT: The differences are always less obvious on YT, especially when one of the biggest changes is framerate, but it does look notably better. Not sure I'll double dip though.
Raziel123 said:
|
Ah yes, that actually explains it. They have already trained their eyes to accept those lower resolutions as the end all be all and now see anything different (even if higher) in a negative light.
Thanks jlmurph!