By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Angry joe vs Angry IGN review editor - Twitter fight because the titanfall review.

Tagged games:

Porcupine_I on 18 April 2014

Ha! i get it now! The joke is on Joe!

He didn't notice the other guy's twitter was stuck reapeating the same thing over and over again and he kept replying as if talking to a person



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Around the Network
Rychussnik on 18 April 2014
petroleo said:
Rychussnik said:
petroleo said:
The game after a while is hell boredoom, period. Xbox one users are just on the defense side cause is probably for them the only game they can praise. In the end thats sad but also I feel you xbox one users bros:

[img]http://i2.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/393/i-know-that-feel.jpg[img]


dude, get that fanboy bullshit outta here. 

on topic, I think joe was right, when Titanfall released, i watched he and IGN's review, and both reviewers make valid points. Joe knocked the game over it's shoehorned campaign, and Ryan (IGN) really enjoyed the chaos of the multiplayer, two different people, two different scores. 

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags

Thats exactly the problem with today reviewers, most of them beeing impartial and aim all their apreciation  towards just one part of the game for example MP only part, Joe in other hand sees games as what it has to have to be a complete package thats why I agree 100% on him. That reviewer in IGN should get a department change and stay away from reviews cause this guys cant differentiate between a complete game and a half game, MP only games shouldn't cost full price , I wouldn't have any problem with Titanfall if it cost at max 29.99,  I mean you need to have by force internet to have fun with this game. and you know what is even worse ?, if a new guy/girl start playing this game right now, I'm 100% sure is gonna get owned by the most advance players. I mean really pay 60 bucks to get owned right away ?, that's why SP part is so important it dives you into the game mechanics first.

 

    


i agree with you on the part about Joe, Joe knocked the game's crappy campaign, and wished that they just left it out all together, and it probably would have scored higher if they just left it out. 

But at the same time, calling Titanfall an incomplete game isnt right. Does every game have to come with multiplayer and singleplayer? i don't see single player games getting bashed as much as multiplayer games, even tho, by your definition, both games are incomplete



Me gusta queso 

psn id: rychussnik

Scoobes on 19 April 2014
Rychussnik said:


i agree with you on the part about Joe, Joe knocked the game's crappy campaign, and wished that they just left it out all together, and it probably would have scored higher if they just left it out. 

But at the same time, calling Titanfall an incomplete game isnt right. Does every game have to come with multiplayer and singleplayer? i don't see single player games getting bashed as much as multiplayer games, even tho, by your definition, both games are incomplete

That depends on the amount of content in the single player only game. If it has a quality but short-ish campaign with little replay value and few alt game modes then it'll get slaughtered in reviews on this value aspect. Vanquish, Heavenly Sword, Mirrors Edge and Enslaved were all docked points for lack of long-term content.

The value proposition of Titanfall comes from whether it'll have enough multiplayer content and modes to keep players going over the long-term.




Get your Portable ID!

PullusPardus on 19 April 2014

the guy has an american flag and a bloody soul patch, he's a automatic douchebag and should not be taken seriously.

- Moderated, Carl



forest-spirit on 19 April 2014

Meh, expected an epic fight but all I saw was two babies waving their dicks at each other. This is the kind of battle were everyone is a loser.



Around the Network
Nintentacle on 19 April 2014

That guy from IGN is being an idiot. "Titanfall isn't amazing since we gave it an 8.9/10, not a 9/10!.

Kind of like how an 89 on Metacritic is "Generally favorable reviews" and 90 is "Universal acclaim". Those categories shouldn't even be there.