petroleo said:
Thats exactly the problem with today reviewers, most of them beeing impartial and aim all their apreciation towards just one part of the game for example MP only part, Joe in other hand sees games as what it has to have to be a complete package thats why I agree 100% on him. That reviewer in IGN should get a department change and stay away from reviews cause this guys cant differentiate between a complete game and a half game, MP only games shouldn't cost full price , I wouldn't have any problem with Titanfall if it cost at max 29.99, I mean you need to have by force internet to have fun with this game. and you know what is even worse ?, if a new guy/girl start playing this game right now, I'm 100% sure is gonna get owned by the most advance players. I mean really pay 60 bucks to get owned right away ?, that's why SP part is so important it dives you into the game mechanics first.
|
i agree with you on the part about Joe, Joe knocked the game's crappy campaign, and wished that they just left it out all together, and it probably would have scored higher if they just left it out.
But at the same time, calling Titanfall an incomplete game isnt right. Does every game have to come with multiplayer and singleplayer? i don't see single player games getting bashed as much as multiplayer games, even tho, by your definition, both games are incomplete
Me gusta queso
psn id: rychussnik







