Its better this way. Theres going to be a massive amount of carnage everywhere on the map because of the smaller amount of maps and enough breathing room for players to move.

This might be the most adorable thing I have ever seen on VGChartz. I actually praise the MP and call it awesome, and you're so caught up in catching feelings over my posts that you're deluded into thinking I am "taking a jab" at the game. Are you aware that I have deemed Titanfall to be Game of the Generation? So why would I dare compare it to a MP that I think sucks? Please go and have a Coke and a smile and leave the Internets post detective work to someone else.

So you're saying action and shooting are not a part of the MP, and yet there are modes that revolve entirely around both of those. There are clan challenges in the game revolving entirely around both of those. Did you ever even play the MP in the game? Unlike you apparently, I actually think the MP in LoU is very deep and accomodates both the cautious stealth play style and the aggressive in your face runner styles very well. You clearly didn't spend much time in the game, there are loads of people who equip themselves for charging at people and play the game that way and do it well. Last of Us is not the only MP game with stealth elements, a radar, or that penalizes you for shooting by giving away your position.

You made a comment about how the low player count works better in LoU than Titanfall because of what they are each trying to accomplish. No one said anything about quality. Try proof reading your posts before you hit submit, might help you remember your own posts mo betta :)

And I played LoU MP with people on this very website you're on right now. Hope that helps.

Is this thread still going on? i thought we have cleared up that bullshit that next gen is about more players or higher resolution or framerate anything else that would make it different from last gen.

The next Crysis.

The thing that is upsetting is that they are having 50 combatants on the battle field but only 12 are actual people but the rest are AI, I find that pretty upsetting.
All of my hype for this game is pretty much gone until the modding community finds out a way to make it more then 6v6 (and it will happen for PC), but another option that could happen is EA releasing DLC to allow a higher player count (just a theory of course).

COD is better than Crysis. Sorry...no contest. The guys who made Titanfall made COD.  That puts them on much higher ground than any Crysis game.

The main problem I have is that, at the end of the match...how will you truly know if you owned?

The majority of your kills could be from killing AI. Which wouldn't be something to brag about.

I play multiplayer shooters to guage myself next to other players around the world. If I want to see how much I could destroy the AI, I run through the SP.

I think its great. Shows team skill instead of large player counts having players become victoms. Thats why i liked GEARS multiplayer, cause it was 4 player? I forget its been awhile.

There is a lot of jumping the gun around here. When it comes to online multiplayer, you don't know how good things are until you play it. 6v6 sounds bad on paper but I enjoyed the hell of Gears of War last gen.

6 vs 6 ain't so bad, it's the bots that are making me unsure about this