Chrizum said:
It isn't any good. Remember the Windows Rule. After each good Windows, there comes a bad one. And vice versa. 3.x: good 95: bad 98: good 2000: bad XP: good Vista: bad 7: good 8: bad 7 is the best Windows and is designed for PCs. Windows 8 is designed for tablets and phones and there is no reason to run it on your PC when you have 7 available.
|
You forgot Windows NT and M.E. (I know, I know. Windows M.E never existed! :P)
Also, Windows 2000 was excellent, it was essentially a Windows 98 skinned version of Windows XP, you could even use device drivers for XP on Windows 2000 and vice versa, problem was it was released at a time where everything was still being built for the 9x platform and not NT, which is the same issue XP had on release, that all got ironed out eventually as focus shifted to development on the NT base.
Vista was also decent after a couple of service packs which bumped up it's performance and compatability, the main issue with Vista' though was it was a big departure from XP and device manufacturers were caught off guard, nVidia was actually responsible for a fraction of the Blue-screens of Death, having OEM's sell PC's with 512Mb of Ram and Vista didn't help matters either, bought a new PC? Stiff. It was going to be slow.
As for Windows 8 specifically, it's downright fantastic on my Phone and Windows Tablet, it just feels right.
However, when thrown on my Eyefinity Desktop PC it was a nightmare, why? Metro just doesn't work over so much screen-real estate, large portions of my screens were just a solid colour with nothing in it, it's downright a waste.
So:
3.x: Good
95: Bad
NT: Good for workstations.
98: Good
2000: Good
M.E: Worse Microsoft OS ever.
XP: Good
Vista: Good after a year+
7: Good
8: Good on select form factors.