By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Will 3D Mario U & Mario Kart U be rush like Super Mario 3D Land & Mario Kart 7 when it comes to graphics?

 

Which do U think?

Fully develop, and maybe by this year's end 72 64.29%
 
Not fully develop, to meet release date 11 9.82%
 
Fully develop but only 720p to meet release 19 16.96%
 
See results. 10 8.93%
 
Total:112
Mad55 said:
LilChicken22 said:
Since when do Mario Kart 7/Mario 3D Land have ugly graphics?

This. Those games weren't graphically lacking at all as 3ds titles. 


This



Around the Network

They will both look outstanding, but only 720p native because the Wii U has been designed from the ground up to be a 720p machine. Going by how impressive both Super Mario Galaxies looked on considerably less powerful hardware the 3D Mario in particular should be jaw dropping.



3D land was rushed, and MK7 was extremely rushed. I don't think they can afford to do that again. I don't worry about 3D mario.




3dLand was rushed? news to me. its look great for the system its on. Dont think they could get better. MK7? that felt rushed as hell, but not cause of graphics. NSMB2 really felt rushed.

I hope not, i dont want Ninty to get spooked and rush anything.



Super Mario 3d land and Mario Kart 7 are not rushed in the graphics department.



Around the Network

Uh.... When was Mario Kart 7 rushed and Super Mario 3D Land rushed? SM 3D Land might be short, but compared to SML 1 & 2 for the original Gameboy, this game is pretty damn long. I think these games were developed exactly the way they had intended them to be.

Mario Kart 8 and Super Mario U will be excellent games, much like Mario Kart Wii and Super Mario Galaxy are.

I don't think they will be native 1080p, but only because the Wii U isn't that powerful of a system. How many PS3/360 games are native 1080p after all?



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Of course, they are rushed. Nintendo games are announced and then released within 6 months.
I don't know about you but 6 months sound rushed to me.



Why are they rushed? They were pushed back so there would be more development time.

Can this 3D Mario be as good as the Galaxy games? That's a different question altogether, but it does not relate to the graphical capabilities of either game.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Kaizar said:

Or will it be rush like New Super Mario Bros. U where they fully develop the graphics but only manage to get it to Native 720p because they didn't have enough time to bring it up to Native 1080p graphics for set release date?

Ummmm... I'm pretty sure Nintendo's been saying from day 1 that 720p is the target for most of their 1st party games, including games that have been delayed repeatedly like Pikmin 3.  And what exactly would upping the resolution of a 2D platform to 1080p accomplish?  Aside from making all the jaggies even more apparent than before?



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.

Super Mario 3d Land wasn't a rush.. It was a great game.  The Wiiu game should be greater. There's a different level of budget and power you're working with on a console.