Quick question to you.

Would you rather have bought a slightly gimped version of Ninja Gaiden 2 that is still quite a bit better than Razor's Edge or an upgraded port based on a bad Ninja Gaiden 3 (aka Razor's Edge) ?

Wouldn't sell god, so I doubt it.

To some degree there's credence to the fact that the PS/X userbases will buy more of certain games, and no-one's especially denying that, which'll mean that comparatively bad games might do better (like your FIFA 06 example) in certain places, while comparatively good ones less so elsewhere, but i would say that the Madden sales are also understandably poor, since you're looking at a huge disadvantage in the Wii U version vs other versions.

I do think EA specifically hates Nintendo, though. They were much more open about it in the NES era, and proved petty enough to try to destroy the Dreamcast when Sega wouldn't give in to their ridiculous demands. EA's a pretty sleazy company, and i don't think anyone would say otherwise. The only thing in debate is if they are indeed being unfair towards Nintendo or not, and I would say the evidence stacks in my favor, mostly given the very public evidence from E3 2011-E3 2012

I would have, but i'm a Nintendo-only gamer. I buy what i like, and while i might gripe about what was done to certain games (like the favoritism shown towards the PS360 version of Sonic Unleashed), if the end product is still good enough to buy on its own, i will.

It's more about people who have options. Anyone who has a capable PC, PS3, or 360 would have ZERO reason to buy Mass Effect 3 on Wii U, and due to increasing rates of multiplatform ownership, that means that the third parties get bitten when they try to shortchange one platform (whether deliberately, as in EA's case, or not)

I, meanwhile, overlook Mass Effect 3 because i have doubts about BioWare's ability to design gameplay after Sonic Chronicles and KOTOR. Story and mythos wise, KOTOR was great, but that gameplay...

What...? Mass Effect series has won multiple awards. It is critically and commercially aclaimed franchise. So raising such point questioning its gameplay in general doesn't make much sense. You could say that you are not into shooters or third person cover based shooters with rpg elements in this case but outright questioning the gameplay of a game soley based on previous game the company made with different gameplay just doesn't fit well. 

I just wanted to point that out. You could say that it is third in the series and the fanbase hasn't experienced the storyline and universe prior to this. Thus, they are skeptical about investing their time and money into the game as they might not get the full story experience. 

I was speaking subjectively. WRPGs don't do much to interest me, no, but BioWare's style of D&D-esque gameplay really felt like pulling teeth sometimes, personally.

Although you are correct that I could be being unfair. BioWare's matured as a company since KOTOR, so perhaps ME is better polished in gameplay than what i experienced with their earlier works (Sonic Chronicles was actually okay).

It's not even an issue about getting the full story experience, it's about the fact that nobody who owned anything capable of playing the Trilogy edition would have wasted their time buying ME3 for Wii U, because it just makes no sense.

Mass Effect 3 sales on Wii U should be abysmal. Not only did it launch after the Mass Effect Trilogy. It's being sold at the same price as the entire trilogy with no DLC support. They shoudn't have released the game on WiiU at all if they were going to release it in such a gimped state.

EA want's to sabotage Nintendo, so despite hyping BF at E3 2years ago, EA won't deliver as usual.

I can't take things like this seriously. It seriously implies that somewhere in EA headquarters that there is board where they outline their strategy. On that board they say let's make make Playstation and Xbox success but try our best to sabotage Nintendo. *Than everyone in board room cheers, howls and dances to this beautiful idea*

For those complaing about the price. Wait for the price drop. I love the Mass Effect franchise and i only recently bought ME3 last night for $20. These are third party games. They drop in price over time unlike Nintendo games. 

But at the same time what reason had PS3 owners to buy Mass Effect 2 when it launched a whole year later on their platform ?
Obviously they didn't care enough to buy a 360 for it or a decent PC, had no clue about the story of the first game and yet they still bought it at full price and it sold 41% of the 360 edition.

Well to summarize the launch. Third parties and Nintendo did a lot of mistakes. The interest was there but Nintendo failed to recreate a Wii Sports that drove the (casual) masses to the consoles, while third parties chose to go the cheap way and port their classics and hoped for people to buy their products as 2nd or 3rd games. But can you nowadays expect third parties to make quality exclusive games for your new platform without any kind of guarantee that it does well ?