By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - America thinks gun laws are a joke, and here is why

spurgeonryan said:

Amidst all the gun control talk going on in Congress, we have this going on. People from all over the world are  invited to go to Florida where they have a Burmese Python problem. What is the problem? They have no natural preditors and have been known to eat Crocodiles, baby cows, and whatever else they can fit down their throats. They are also multiplying rather quickly.

Is that so?

This gator begs to differ.



Around the Network
spurgeonryan said:
How will restricting fire arms somehow skip shotguns, rifles, and hand guns?^ Or am I just not understanding you?

I'm saying that conventional shotguns and rifles shouldn't be lumped together with handguns.  The former aren't used in crime a fraction as often as the latter.



DieAppleDie said:
sc94597 said:
DieAppleDie said:
Viper1 said:
DieAppleDie said:
isnt NYC the safest city in the US thanks to strict gun control?

Of all the cities with a population above 250,000, those with the strictest gun laws are actualy those with teh worst gun related crime.

 

Our problem isn't guns, it's gangs and drug laws.   Take another city with little gang or drug issues an the gun related crime rates are incredibly low.



dont you think controlling guns is far easier than controlling drugs?

Not when there are over 300 million guns in the country. 



well yeah, but remember guns are created in factories, and could be easily tracked unless weapons, drugs can be created by anyone

Because we can totally stop other countries from making guns and smuggling them into the country right? And anti-gun laws will totally stop bad people from owning guns?

The real problem is not guns it's gangs and drug wars. The best way to fix that problem would be to just legalize most drugs, not to restrict guns.

There is a reason the worst gun-related crime areas and mass shootings take place in heavily gun controlled areas and gun restricted buildings. 



pokoko said:
Shotguns and normal rifles aren't a problem and have never been a problem. They are useful tools with purposes other than killing people. No one is seriously considering taking these weapons away from the public.


Sorry but there are a lot of nut jobs out there who propose exactly that.



yo_john117 said:
DieAppleDie said:
sc94597 said:
DieAppleDie said:
Viper1 said:
DieAppleDie said:
isnt NYC the safest city in the US thanks to strict gun control?

Of all the cities with a population above 250,000, those with the strictest gun laws are actualy those with teh worst gun related crime.

 

Our problem isn't guns, it's gangs and drug laws.   Take another city with little gang or drug issues an the gun related crime rates are incredibly low.



dont you think controlling guns is far easier than controlling drugs?

Not when there are over 300 million guns in the country. 



well yeah, but remember guns are created in factories, and could be easily tracked unless weapons, drugs can be created by anyone

Because we can totally stop other countries from making guns and smuggling them into the country right? And anti-gun laws will totally stop bad people from owning guns?

The real problem is not guns it's gangs and drug wars. The best way to fix that problem would be to just legalize most drugs, not to restrict guns.

There is a reason the worst gun-related crime areas and mass shootings take place in heavily gun controlled areas and gun restricted buildings. 


+1

You restore an iota of my faith in the human race.



Around the Network
DieAppleDie said:
sc94597 said:
DieAppleDie said:
Viper1 said:
DieAppleDie said:
isnt NYC the safest city in the US thanks to strict gun control?

Of all the cities with a population above 250,000, those with the strictest gun laws are actualy those with teh worst gun related crime.

 

Our problem isn't guns, it's gangs and drug laws.   Take another city with little gang or drug issues an the gun related crime rates are incredibly low.



dont you think controlling guns is far easier than controlling drugs?

Not when there are over 300 million guns in the country. 



well yeah, but remember guns are created in factories, and could be easily tracked unless weapons, drugs can be created by anyone

You can make a handgun with $5 dollars worht of material in 20 minutes. You can make an automatic rifle with less than $100. The only thing that prevents people from doing such is that there are already guns on the market. The bigger problem would be a lack of ammunition of course, but even that can be made easily. In fact, guns are easier to make than drugs because you have to grow the plants or play with the chemicals. All you need to make a gun is to put a few components together. 



sc94597 said:
DieAppleDie said:
sc94597 said:
DieAppleDie said:
Viper1 said:
DieAppleDie said:
isnt NYC the safest city in the US thanks to strict gun control?

Of all the cities with a population above 250,000, those with the strictest gun laws are actualy those with teh worst gun related crime.

 

Our problem isn't guns, it's gangs and drug laws.   Take another city with little gang or drug issues an the gun related crime rates are incredibly low.



dont you think controlling guns is far easier than controlling drugs?

Not when there are over 300 million guns in the country. 



well yeah, but remember guns are created in factories, and could be easily tracked unless weapons, drugs can be created by anyone

You can make a handgun with $5 dollars worht of material in 20 minutes. You can make an automatic rifle with less than $100. The only thing that prevents people from doing such is that there are already guns on the market. The bigger problem would be a lack of ammunition of course, but even that can be made easily. In fact, guns are easier to make than drugs because you have to grow the plants or play with the chemicals. All you need to make a gun is to put a few components together. 



lol, are going to forge the components yourself? anyway, my point is gun control maybe not be the panacea, but sure is better than zero control



pokoko said:
Shotguns and normal rifles aren't a problem and have never been a problem. They are useful tools with purposes other than killing people. No one is seriously considering taking these weapons away from the public.

As a long time gun owner, who has never harmed anyone, I can assure you that there is no different between what you call a "normal rifle" and for example an AR-15, which is the semi-automatic version of the military's M16. The serve the same purpose and you can hunt with both. A hunting rifle usually comes with a wood stock, but you can get synthetic black stocks with folding stocks, extended magazines/clips, and any kind of optics you could want. You can make a hunting rifle purchased from Wal-Mart look just like the scary guns from blockbuster movies and COD. You can also buy a Mini-14 which is just the "ranch" version of the AR-15 which like I said is the civilian version of the M16. The Mini-14 fires the same ammo, from the same size magazines, but it comes with a wood stock and looks like a hunting rifle.

But then again maybe you're talking about handguns. Handguns are tools too. Very important tools. If you have a permit you can protect yourself and your family from dangerous people who would kill you for your shoes. Or you could be like me and enjoying target shooting with a 9mm because it's fun and a very practical hobby.

Again as a long time gun owner of both shotguns, rifles, and handguns I have never harmed anyone. My guns are locked up so no visitors or their kids could cause an accident.

If your problem is that guns were designed for "killing people" as you put, I suggest you read up on the history of a great many technologies and their origin. The Military is responsible for the computer you are typing on and the internet you are posting on. The first real computers were designed for calculating long range trajectory so ships could drop shells on other ships fill with people. Computers were designed for killing people. But like guns, computers have other uses too. Some people choose to use computers to do harm just as some people choose to use guns to do others harm. Those people are called criminals and no law has ever stopped a criminal from breaking the law. Criminals commit crimes, that is what makes them criminals. Taking guns away from law abiding citizens cannot stop criminals from committing crimes. Take a look at the international murder rate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

The USA shows up at 4.8 out of over 100,000 people. The USA is about in the middle to lower half of murder rates. Many countries with higher rates have gun bans.

Scary guns with black stocks aren't causing crime. Scary criminals cause crime.



Is anyone talking about zero control? That would be madness, that's thinking in extremes, just like people who want every .22 & duck gun melted down.



DieAppleDie said:

well yeah, but remember guns are created in factories, and could be easily tracked unless weapons, drugs can be created by anyone

It won't be long before guns can be created by just about anyone, too.