This is the internet...

It is actually very easy to judge how good the 6 hour SP and  huge multiplayer modes are going to be, just by looking at some videos....

In all seriousness, maybe we are rating the beta? I had some fun when I played it, but I always felt that the maps should be 64 player not 32

No idea what to make of this game. If it's good, that's great. I'll just sit back and see how people react to it, for now.

I'll probably get it when they combine it with Warhawk in a compilation disc.

looks good. I might get this down the line. It's something unique and different.

it actually looks like a ton of fun...i watched some beta videos and got pretty hyped, and then i remembered i dont buy games just for multiplayer......ill probably skip this for a while

78 at metacritic but im still interested.

79 on metacritic http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/starhawk

1 million for a game like this without any real hype will be really good. PS3 exclusives usually sells 1.5m in must cases unless the game is horrible.

Haven't cared to browse around game reviews in the past few months but I kinda figured IGN would be one of the few 9's that Starhawk gets.

ugh, why is it okay for campaign-focused games to have shitty multiplayer but not the other way around? Every goddamn review I've been reading talks so much about Starhawk's campaign (which doesn't seem to be that good) while taking only about 10% of their review time to actually discuss the multiplayer/co-op.


F gaming journalism. Day 1 here.