By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Poll: Which team wins Super Bowl XLIV?

 

Poll: Which team wins Super Bowl XLIV?

Indianapolis Colts 29 40.28%
 
New Orleans Saints 43 59.72%
 
Total:72
Onyxmeth on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:
Kasz216 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.

The Vikings consist of multiple offensive threats. Titans? Not so much.

Sure, stats wise he's better, but put A.P is the better player.

Chris Johnson has had a good year, a better one than A.P no doubt.

But, I repeat, Petterson is still the better player overall.

Dude... it's not even close.

Chris Johnson is WAY better then Adrian Peterson.

Chris Johnson is like the new Barry Sanders.

Guy had more 40+ rushes in ONE SEASON.... then any other runningback in a year.

He also had more 85+ Rushes for TDs in a season then anyone has had... in their career.


This is something AP could not do.

--Going by statistics Wilt is better than Jordan, but many would disagree.

 

But nonetheless, I have to agree with you. C.J is the better RB after checking him on yahoo.

 

The difference being that Wilt Chamberlain and Michael Jordan played in different eras. Had they played at the same time, there would have been no confusion. One would have been thought of as better than the other. We're talking about two guys playing at the same time under the same teams and conditions. You're essentially talking about comparing Jim Brown to Emmitt Smith. Chris Johnson is simply better than All Day until it's proven otherwise.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Around the Network
outlawauron on 26 January 2010
Khuutra said:
Saints will win.

Because I want them to, you see.

Amen!



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Khuutra on 26 January 2010
outlawauron said:
Khuutra said:
Saints will win.

Because I want them to, you see.

Amen!

People need to learn how this shit works



Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010

The difference being that Wilt Chamberlain and Michael Jordan played in different eras. Had they played at the same time, there would have been no confusion. One would have been thought of as better than the other. We're talking about two guys playing at the same time under the same teams and conditions. You're essentially talking about comparing Jim Brown to Emmitt Smith. Chris Johnson is simply better than All Day until it's proven otherwise.

 

Wilt and Kobe can't really be compared outside of statistics. They play two different positions. You see what I did there?

Secondly, statistics don't always make the case.

Round 2:

Kobe and LeBron make the perfect case.
 

-Kobe is better than LeBron anyday of the week. Why? You want him to make the last play.

Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan also make a good case.

-KG for most of his career has been the better guy statistically. But TD is recognized by everyone as the better player.

 

 




outlawauron on 26 January 2010
Khuutra said:
outlawauron said:
Khuutra said:
Saints will win.

Because I want them to, you see.

Amen!

People need to learn how this shit works

I agree, people posting seem to think the Saints are going to get owned.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
Onyxmeth on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:

The difference being that Wilt Chamberlain and Michael Jordan played in different eras. Had they played at the same time, there would have been no confusion. One would have been thought of as better than the other. We're talking about two guys playing at the same time under the same teams and conditions. You're essentially talking about comparing Jim Brown to Emmitt Smith. Chris Johnson is simply better than All Day until it's proven otherwise.

 

Wilt and Kobe can't really be compared outside of statistics. They play two different positions. You see what I did there?

Secondly, statistics don't always make the case.

Round 2:

Kobe and LeBron make the perfect case.

-Kobe is better than LeBron anyday of the week. Why? You want him to make the last play.

Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan also make a good case.

-KG for most of his career has been the better guy statistically. But TD is recognized by everyone as the better player.

 

 

So what you're trying to tell me is that the same people that are wrong about Tim Duncan being better than Kevin Garnett are the same people that are wrong about Adrian Peterson being better than Chris Johnson? Gotcha.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

The difference being that Wilt Chamberlain and Michael Jordan played in different eras. Had they played at the same time, there would have been no confusion. One would have been thought of as better than the other. We're talking about two guys playing at the same time under the same teams and conditions. You're essentially talking about comparing Jim Brown to Emmitt Smith. Chris Johnson is simply better than All Day until it's proven otherwise.

 

Wilt and Kobe can't really be compared outside of statistics. They play two different positions. You see what I did there?

Secondly, statistics don't always make the case.

Round 2:

Kobe and LeBron make the perfect case.

-Kobe is better than LeBron anyday of the week. Why? You want him to make the last play.

Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan also make a good case.

-KG for most of his career has been the better guy statistically. But TD is recognized by everyone as the better player.

 

 

So what you're trying to tell me is that the same people that are wrong about Tim Duncan being better than Kevin Garnett are the same people that are wrong about Adrian Peterson being better than Chris Johnson? Gotcha.

You got it all twisted. The same people that are wrong about Kevin Garnett being better than Tim Duncan are the same people that are wrong about Chris Johnson being better than A.D.

 

EDIT:

I was joking in my first attempt, but come to think of it LeBron James, and Kevin Garnett are a lot like CJ. Young, and breaking records, but yet fail to beat their counterparts at the end. Well, you can still make an argument for LeBron, but KG is done.

 




Onyxmeth on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:

So what you're trying to tell me is that the same people that are wrong about Tim Duncan being better than Kevin Garnett are the same people that are wrong about Adrian Peterson being better than Chris Johnson? Gotcha.

You got it all twisted. The same people that are wrong about Kevin Garnett being better than Tim Duncan are the same people that are wrong about Chris Johnson being better than A.D.

 

Why? Tim Duncan's legacy is predicated on his 3 championships. That is always what has held Kevin Garnett back. However I see what he managed to do the moment a good squad is put around him in Boston. You've yet to provide a single argument as to why Adrian Peterson is better than Chris Johnson. He has done absolutely nothing better than Chris Johnson has statistically. He hasn't brought his team to any more success than Johnson has. He hasn't broken out for as many big runs as Johnson has. He fumbles far more than CJ also. In fact AP's only competition for worst fumbling starting RBs is Steve Slaton, and that guy is teetering on keeping a starting position. I mean AP can't mentally wrap his head around switching his ball carrying hand when running to his left to help protect it. 

You can say all day that Adrian Peterson is better. However, I doubt you'll be able to come up with any actual reasoning behind it, other than more silly analogies.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Snake612 on 26 January 2010

I want the Saints to win but Colts are going win this one. Anyways, as my friend would say, Green Bay Packers! 2011 Super Bowl Champions!



TO GOD BE THE GLORY

Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:

So what you're trying to tell me is that the same people that are wrong about Tim Duncan being better than Kevin Garnett are the same people that are wrong about Adrian Peterson being better than Chris Johnson? Gotcha.

You got it all twisted. The same people that are wrong about Kevin Garnett being better than Tim Duncan are the same people that are wrong about Chris Johnson being better than A.D.

 

Why? Tim Duncan's legacy is predicated on his 3 championships. That is always what has held Kevin Garnett back. However I see what he managed to do the moment a good squad is put around him in Boston. You've yet to provide a single argument as to why Adrian Peterson is better than Chris Johnson. He has done absolutely nothing better than Chris Johnson has statistically. He hasn't brought his team to any more success than Johnson has. He hasn't broken out for as many big runs as Johnson has. He fumbles far more than CJ also. In fact AP's only competition for worst fumbling starting RBs is Steve Slaton, and that guy is teetering on keeping a starting position. I mean AP can't mentally wrap his head around switching his ball carrying hand when running to his left to help protect it. 

You can say all day that Adrian Peterson is better. However, I doubt you'll be able to come up with any actual reasoning behind it, other than more silly analogies.

Did you read the second part of my post?

Secondly you TD legacy argument is wrong. Go check what the Spurs did in 2003 with their line-up. TD showed that he's the better leader right after he won the NBA finals that year. This pretty much established who the better player was and will be.This is coming from a die hard Minnesota Timberwolves.

-You can only imagine how many times this argument has been brought up for us.

Who holdest the NFL Single game rushing record again?

A.P can take it to the defense way better than C.J. Peterson is a defensive magnet. After all the hits Peterson gets, he's more likely to fumble than CJ. CJ, however, has better ball security.