Sephiroth357 said:
You got it all twisted. The same people that are wrong about Kevin Garnett being better than Tim Duncan are the same people that are wrong about Chris Johnson being better than A.D.
|
Why? Tim Duncan's legacy is predicated on his 3 championships. That is always what has held Kevin Garnett back. However I see what he managed to do the moment a good squad is put around him in Boston. You've yet to provide a single argument as to why Adrian Peterson is better than Chris Johnson. He has done absolutely nothing better than Chris Johnson has statistically. He hasn't brought his team to any more success than Johnson has. He hasn't broken out for as many big runs as Johnson has. He fumbles far more than CJ also. In fact AP's only competition for worst fumbling starting RBs is Steve Slaton, and that guy is teetering on keeping a starting position. I mean AP can't mentally wrap his head around switching his ball carrying hand when running to his left to help protect it.
You can say all day that Adrian Peterson is better. However, I doubt you'll be able to come up with any actual reasoning behind it, other than more silly analogies.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
