Onyxmeth said:
Why? Tim Duncan's legacy is predicated on his 3 championships. That is always what has held Kevin Garnett back. However I see what he managed to do the moment a good squad is put around him in Boston. You've yet to provide a single argument as to why Adrian Peterson is better than Chris Johnson. He has done absolutely nothing better than Chris Johnson has statistically. He hasn't brought his team to any more success than Johnson has. He hasn't broken out for as many big runs as Johnson has. He fumbles far more than CJ also. In fact AP's only competition for worst fumbling starting RBs is Steve Slaton, and that guy is teetering on keeping a starting position. I mean AP can't mentally wrap his head around switching his ball carrying hand when running to his left to help protect it. You can say all day that Adrian Peterson is better. However, I doubt you'll be able to come up with any actual reasoning behind it, other than more silly analogies. |
Did you read the second part of my post?
Secondly you TD legacy argument is wrong. Go check what the Spurs did in 2003 with their line-up. TD showed that he's the better leader right after he won the NBA finals that year. This pretty much established who the better player was and will be.This is coming from a die hard Minnesota Timberwolves.
-You can only imagine how many times this argument has been brought up for us.
Who holdest the NFL Single game rushing record again?
A.P can take it to the defense way better than C.J. Peterson is a defensive magnet. After all the hits Peterson gets, he's more likely to fumble than CJ. CJ, however, has better ball security.