Only the certain arrogant IGN staff are never trustable, the people who praise Nintendo have give wii games high score are the ones who never bad-mouth them, if not never. I think Matt is one of the kindest to Nintendo.

I wonder if the Nintendo team is doing something that i would call distasteful: giving higher overall scores to some wii games after the Hattfield (did i spell that right?) editorial sham.

Because if they are.....then it's not a consolation in my eyes, it's pathetic.

@nintendogamer:
didn't matt wrote the column "nintendo is lazy and you don't care"

How do you know I think it's worth a 10?

It's not about being kind or not, it's about rating a game fairly so that people know what they buy.

Another Wii epic title. I hope this becomes a trend for the rest of the year...

?

Forget it.

no, the review itself is pretty flawed, for example it implies that marvel vs capcom 2 is well balanced,

and it seems just as uninformed as any Bozon writes, It would have been nice if he mentioned that the game had a set up identical to Kizuna Encounter, but not a single mention of Battle of the Planets and behaving as if these characters are complete unknowns, some may be obscure but dead minimum a significant number of people will recognize the Gatchaman characters

!

Sure thing.

Ok, I think Ign reviewers got really punished by 'da boss because of their nintendo boycott and now their trying to compensate that or they'll lose their jobs