Cartoony, because much less time has to be put into the graphics to make them look good, and everything has a clear function in the game world with good contrast (as oppose to everything being grey/brown and indistinct if realism is done badly).

Halo is realistic cartoony - yes, but MW2 is not cartoony at all.

nightsurge said: True gamers care less about graphics and more about gameplay.

Most gamers would disagree with you on the sole purpose that they think they are True Gamers.

I prefer stylist graphics than real. Since style isn't in the list. I'll go with cartoony.

^^ exactly how i feel. style >>> no style, pretty basic

since there's no "style" chocie i'll go with cartoony too

@Bolded, I was sorely disappointed at Dragon Age's graphics on my 360, but I still really enjoyed it. I'm not sure if that makes me a "true gamer", I suspect I'm not. I'm not a hardcore anything really.

Geez guys, don't you recognize a smiley face when you see one? And I didn't say they didn't care AT ALL about graphics, I just said that graphics, for the most part, are secondary to the experiences the game offers. Games can still have compelling, rich, and amazing stories without the bleeding realism in the graphics department. Innovation, style, story, gameplay, etc all play a big part.

I guess I've reached the point where I don't care about which games look the best, so long as the graphics do enough for the game that it is meant for and the gameplay draws me in, I'm sold. I still like nice graphics, but it's not the deciding factor. That's all I was trying to say

I think the GoW one should be called "Realistic Gore" and the other one simply "Realistic"

Most types are good. Some annoy me like Wind Waker and Borderlands. But I'm not likely to sink much time into either type of game, anyway.

The Uncharted type....

Anyway, I like every type if they are done well

Vector graphics.

If only they would make a CoD using them!