At this point in time there no way we can actually compare GOW3 with UC2, because what we see for GOW3 are still in BEAT stage.
the real justification in comparing the both is when GOW3 finally releases into the market.
Will God of War III push the PS3 past Uncharted 2's Graphical Success?! | |||
Dang Skippy! Yes. | 158 | 63.20% | |
In your dreams CGI! No. | 91 | 36.40% | |
Total: | 249 |
At this point in time there no way we can actually compare GOW3 with UC2, because what we see for GOW3 are still in BEAT stage.
the real justification in comparing the both is when GOW3 finally releases into the market.
DaBuddahN said:
What? Can you READ properly? I said "art" is not objective! You can create art through CGI, but CGI is not art. My point still stands; art is not objective, therefor art is not technical in nature! You said and I quote "Alot of art is technically better than other art", which is complete bs. =/ |
Yes graphics ARE art. and yes art IS technical in nature. It depends how that art is achieved. So what we have is 2 different methods of the way people view art.
1. Art ( graphics ) on a scale of best to worst are determined by how it is achieved ( eg. 640p, 720p, specular lighting etc. )
2. Art ( graphics ) on a scale of best to worst are determined by exactly what you see and how it pleases the individuals eyes. Regardless of resolution, methods of lighting etc.
Many people around the review world base their graphics scores nearly whole sole on option number 1. as do many sites that say x exclusive is better than y exclusive.
But I prefer method 2. I couldnt care less how something was achieved. Hence why Banjo Kazooie is high on my list. As is Tales Of Vesperia.
Offcourse it won't. God of War 3 is 1080P, Uncharted 2 is 720P. So it can't have more detail than Uncharted because the resolution is twice as heavy.
DaBuddahN said:
What? Can you READ properly? I said "art" is not objective! You can create art through CGI, but CGI is not art. My point still stands; art is not objective, therefor art is not technical in nature! You said and I quote "Alot of art is technically better than other art", which is complete bs. =/ |
Yes graphics ARE art. and yes art IS technical in nature. It depends how that art is achieved. So what we have is 2 different methods of the way people view art.
1. Art ( graphics ) on a scale of best to worst are determined by how it is achieved ( eg. 640p, 720p, specular lighting etc. )
2. Art ( graphics ) on a scale of best to worst are determined by exactly what you see and how it pleases the individuals eyes. Regardless of resolution, methods of lighting etc.
Many people around the review world base their graphics scores nearly whole sole on option number 1. as do many sites that say x exclusive is better than y exclusive.
But I prefer method 2. I couldnt care less how something was achieved. Hence why Banjo Kazooie is high on my list. As is Tales Of Vesperia.
@ Selnor - Regarding your 2nd post here, I take it then you realise how awfully bad Forza 3s graphics suck balls compared to the screenshots, how everything blurs, looks cartoony and how the cockpit visuals are an absolute joke? I also take it that you admire KZ2s graphics since your after grit and intensity?
@ OP - How did U2 max out the PS3 when KZ2 didn't?
i don't think it will. it's santa monica's first ps3 game whereas uncharted 2 was ND's second attempt.
I'm also pretty sure that I read that the graphics in the demo were 'final', i.e., that they were happy with them, and didn't really want to improve them any further. That may have changed since then though (think I read the article 5+ months ago).
Its hard to say. I played Uncharted 2 and that game is very polished. Also i played the GOW III. Like many have said it would have to be the released that will determine it for me. Man Uncharted 2 is a badass game. It beat alot of games out in '09. Well, just have to wait and see before will can truly decided. Definitely a big fan of both.
http://www.vgchartz.com/sigs/output.php?userid=60726%5B/img%5D%5B/url%5D">
According to what everyone who has seen the latest build for this game has said, it looks at least as good as Uncharted 2, if not better. So I'd say it definitely has a chance at being the new Console Graphics King.
Odd. Future. Wolf. Gang. Kill. Em. All. OFWGKTA Don't give a fuck!
Fuck Steve Harvey. FREE EARL!
Final Fantasy Versus XIII will be the GREATEST game EVER made!!!
I'd take a bullet for Square-Enix!
BigBoobieHead said: @ Selnor - Regarding your 2nd post here, I take it then you realise how awfully bad Forza 3s graphics suck balls compared to the screenshots, how everything blurs, looks cartoony and how the cockpit visuals are an absolute joke? I also take it that you admire KZ2s graphics since your after grit and intensity? @ OP - How did U2 max out the PS3 when KZ2 didn't? |
1. FM3 has fantastic graphics. It doesnt have crap scenery to make other parts look slightly better. It's overall look is fantastic. And it's cockpit view is beautiful, now with moving hand for gear changes. Obviously you have not moved the cockpit view back to GT5P position. There it looks fantastic and very detailed as your not right up close to the wheel anymore. And I like that it has more colour ( what you call cartoony ) it gives it character where GT5P had no character.
2. KZ2 I have in my list of top 10, but MW2 was more gritty and made me duck and dive my real head alot more than KZ2.
Well, they're completely different games, so it'll be next to impossible to fairly compare the two on graphics. It all comes down to personal preference, in the end.
Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee 3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046