Easy with the hyperbole/stealth trolling there Zen. Based on the demo the ps3 version of Bayonetta is perfectly playable. Even if there are framerate drops or worse textures, someone with only a ps3 will enjoy this game just fine. Anyone with both systems would reasonably get it for x360 though, for obvious reasons. There is a difference but I hope it wouldn't be a deal breaker for what looks to be the best action game since Devil May Cry 3.

I have no idea about bayonetta and couldn't care less. I'm commenting on the OP's assertion that Bayonetta is an inferior port and taking his assumptions as my own when I form my argument. These assumptions are his, and are not based on any sort of bias that I personally have against the PS3. I'm using Bayonetta as an example to illustrate my point because the OP did, and I'm not trying to offend any defensive PS3 owners with said example, but at the same time, I don't feel the need to sugar coat the percieved situation either.

Thank you sir, I've accepted your friend request. :)

they should not be allowed to release the game. for example, i know that its not legal to sell bad food, cars that freeze and lag around, books with several pages missing, dvds where half of the movie is erased. i can't believe that there are not rules about selling broken games in 2009. in any other market, companies would be sued left and right.

I'm sorry, but that's completely wrong.. The term broken is an industry term, and it doesn't actually mean the game doesn't work, or that its unplayable. In most cases, it simply means that a game is inferior to its counterpart on another console in some way. Should MS not be allowed to sell the 360 because it doesn't have BR? Should Square be stopped from selling FFXIII on the 360 due to lossless audio?

Truth is, with Bayonetta and Ghostbusters, PS3 fans probably will get an inferior version of the game, however, saying that you would rather not let any PS3 owner have the option to play it at all, is bad for gamers. If there was no 360 version, you wouldn't know a difference, and it wouldn't be called "broken" at all.

Broken products SHOULD NOT be sold. However, defining an inferior but perfectly functional port as "broken" in the sense that it should be recalled, is totally misunderstanding an industry buzzword, and mistaking that buzzword's definition for its literal meaning.

who cares when the game is boring. gow3 will be better

You have likely never played Bayonetta, and you certainly haven't played God of War III. You can have a hopeful opinion, but the truth is, with the praise this game is getting on the 360 and PS3, GAMERS should care, but bias console fans seem to care a lot more, because they certainly put a lot of effort in marginalization.

No worries about the response, this is a forum and you can respond whenever, even 10 months from now .  And who said they should listen to everything Sony says?  The one point they should is the "start on PS3 first and move to the 360", and is probably what every dev, yes in the world, should be doing.  You have a PS3 version to make, it's highly documented that going from the 360 to the PS3 is a big pain in the ass, but going the other way around is significantly easier.  Why should devs waste time, money and resources struggling to get a PS3 port of a game up and running when if they just made it on the PS3 first with the 360 in mind, would save them time, resources and more importantly money.  Disagree with me if you want, that's cool, but look at the devs that did do that? Games like Burnout, Devil May Cry, others I can't think of off the top of my head, they all started on the PS3 and moved to others.  Well Devil May Cry was made on a PC framework, but that framework was specifically designed to run 99% identicle on each other and Devil May Cry was probably working hand in hand on a PS3 since it was "exclusively on Playstation 3". Game was designed to run on the PS3 a 360 port was made late in development and came out 99% identicle.   Can you say the same for 90% of the other games with problems?  Why do you think Bayonetta has such problems?  It wasn't designed for the PS3 at all, took advantage of coding practices that's good for the 360 and horrible on the PS3 and look at how the game turned out.  I can go on with another paragraph about that too, but long story short if the game was made on the PS3 or atleast with the PS3s ram/shaders in mind there would have been no problem with that port or the majority of the ports on the PS3 for that matter.

wow, what a great sense of busines you have. So now Uncharted 2 "only" selling over 2 million in 2 months is nothing compared to L4D2? The key with Business is opening up your line of products to more consumers, wider range of potential buyer. Which is why 85% of the games this gen are multiplat. If other 3rd parties went by your logic, that's like Activision saying, well we sold 8 million copies of MW2 on 360 and only 5 milion copies on PS3, we should not even bother with ps3 anymore.

Yes, L4D2  is selling great passing over 2 M thus far far on 360, but if it was on PS3, it might have sold a million or so on that system as well. By not being on PS3, there losing potential sales. The same reason now why Insominiac are thinking of going mulitplat.

The key to buisnees is managing your limited resources to provide the greatest ROI..period!  I've said it before, and I'll say it again, companies make games to make money...based on the statistics of attach rates, there should be ANY 3rd party developers NOT working on the 360, but they do...why?  It's because of ROI, but somehow, people forget to think about that when looking at why people do what they do in the industry.