By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Should homosexuals be executed? The BBC wants to know.

numonex said:
BBC should keep out of Ugandan politics. What they do in Uganda is up to their government. Mind your own business.

And what Hitler does in Germany and continental Europe is up to him. Why don't the Russian, British and Americans mind their own business. 



Around the Network
ultima said:

@coolestguyever and numonex
So US is the international police only when oil or Russia is involved?

BBC is British, not American.

And basically to answer your question, yes.



Seece said:
Yes, hang me now ...

You just want to be tied up.

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.



                            

Carl2291 said:

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.

Racist.



badgenome said:
Carl2291 said:

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.

Racist.

Peado is not a race.



                            

Around the Network
Carl2291 said:
badgenome said:
Carl2291 said:

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.

Racist.

Peado is not a race.

Peadophiles usually have other mental issues and should be put in a mental institution and given help, not executed. 

Plus if you start executing peado's and not murderers, then the peadophile might kill the child afterwards to escape being executed.



tombi123 said:
Carl2291 said:
badgenome said:
Carl2291 said:

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.

Racist.

Peado is not a race.

Peadophiles usually have other mental issues and should be put in a mental institution and given help, not executed. 

Plus if you start executing peado's and not murderers, then the peadophile might kill the child afterwards to escape being executed.

Peados dont deserve any kind of help.

Peados who murder the kid too should be executed... Slowly. 



                            

I wonder what's the point of having a debate when you can't get a single rational human being to defend one of the positions. I mean, the only good thing I see about this is that it'll raise awareness of something that needs to be changed because it's pretty much medieval, but I cannot see a proper "debate" here, I mean, the point of a debate is to try to argue which position is more correct, and here, well....let's just say that there's one position that's completely wrong and leave it like that




Tyrannical said:
Kasz216 said:
Tyrannical said:

Have you ever heard Europeans or Americans condemn Saudi Arabia or Asian countries for their laws against homosexuality? ( they are even more harsh). Why do Western countries specifically point out African countries? Why is the West so obsessed with homosexuality in Africa yet we have more pressing problems like lack of education, clean water, poor health, poverty etc... This is pure RACISM with a colonial mentality.

Olal Otunu, kampala, Uganda

 

Ha, I found this comment on the site. 

Y'all be rasis crackars, bad mouthin Uganda an all.

You... actually kinda have a point here.

 

Though if the BBC asked about Saudi Arabia... I think people would still complain about their law.

I'm not sure how a law can be more strict then death though.

People do from time to time "speak up" against Human rights abuse in some Asian and Muslim countries. I don't think I have ever heard of any serious movement to suggest sanctions or anyother type of serious action. While I'm sure we give aid to Uganda, I'm sure they are not the only country with a differing opinion on Human rights that we send aid to.

But AIDS is only a Homosexual disease in Western nations. In Africa, it is mainly spread through promiscuous sexual activity regardless of sexual orientation. I could see executions for fornication as a means to combat AIDS, but I think it is unfair to soley target the Homosexuals.

 

Estimated per act risk for acquisition
of HIV by exposure route[79]

Exposure Route

Estimated infections
per 10,000 exposures
to an infected source

Blood Transfusion

9,000[80]

Childbirth (to child)

2,500[61]

Needle-sharing injection drug use

67[81]

Percutaneous needle stick

30[82]

Receptive anal intercourse*

50[83][84]

Insertive anal intercourse*

6.5[83][84]

Receptive penile-vaginal intercourse*

10[83][84][85]

Insertive penile-vaginal intercourse*

5[83][84]

Receptive oral intercourse

1[84]

Insertive oral intercourse

0.5[84]

* assuming no condom use
§ source refers to oral intercourse
performed on a man

In regards to the bolded, that AIDS is "only a homosexual problem in the west" please see the above chart. Estimated infection causes per 10,000 cases, 9,000 are from blood transfusions! Only 56.5 (or 5.65%) are from anal intercourse. Please do NOT spread garbage on the internet, there is plenty there already.



Carl2291 said:
tombi123 said:
Carl2291 said:
badgenome said:
Carl2291 said:

OT: Only one kind of person should be executed, gay people, aint them.

Racist.

Peado is not a race.

Peadophiles usually have other mental issues and should be put in a mental institution and given help, not executed. 

Plus if you start executing peado's and not murderers, then the peadophile might kill the child afterwards to escape being executed.

Peados dont deserve any kind of help.

Peados who murder the kid too should be executed... Slowly. 

But how would you know the murderer also had sex with the kid. 

And people with mental issues DO deserve help.