By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Current situation does not matter, Microsoft has WON ...

kirby007 on 29 November 2009
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
Carl2291 said:
All this proves is that the Original Xbox was trash compared to the PS2, PS3 and 360.

Infact... Why dont you do one of those special graph thingy's for PS3 and 360?

See which one of those is winning if you align the launches like that?


But that isn't the point of my OP

@ all the other people, my post lets us see that even though the ps3 is doing better atm then the 360 sony still lost

Nah, that just means that Sony didn't do as well as last gen, and Microsoft did better than last gen.  It's still to close to call either a winner, as it may even depend on which (if either) motion control is accepted by the public.


microsoft won marketshare didn't they?

Well they were out a year longer, and the generation isn't over.  Right now it's too close to say (it's practically a tie if you allign launches) and it could go either way.  Especially if Microsoft EOLs the 360 before Sony does the PS3...

and also when we do look at the hard numbers 360>xbox ps2>ps3



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
letsdance on 29 November 2009
ViolentPhlegm said:
By this reasoning, Sega WON the 16-bit generation.


lol... i know... SEGA won 16bit generation with this logic... look where they are now.



kirby007 on 29 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
^^^HAHAHA

So ppl was right then this logic is full of crap cause by this logic it would mean that Wii is a loser because it didnt beat its last year sales which we all know isnt true.....Spin some more plz.


no, I do not compare year over year, but generation over generation



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Carl on 29 November 2009
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
Carl2291 said:
All this proves is that the Original Xbox was trash compared to the PS2, PS3 and 360.

Infact... Why dont you do one of those special graph thingy's for PS3 and 360?

See which one of those is winning if you align the launches like that?


But that isn't the point of my OP

@ all the other people, my post lets us see that even though the ps3 is doing better atm then the 360 sony still lost

Nah, that just means that Sony didn't do as well as last gen, and Microsoft did better than last gen.  It's still to close to call either a winner, as it may even depend on which (if either) motion control is accepted by the public.


microsoft won marketshare didn't they?

Well they were out a year longer, and the generation isn't over.  Right now it's too close to say (it's practically a tie if you allign launches) and it could go either way.  Especially if Microsoft EOLs the 360 before Sony does the PS3...

and also when we do look at the hard numbers 360>xbox ps2>ps3

As of right now, PS2 > Everything, so thats hardly a bad thing.

How about this...

PS3 > PS1 > 360?



                            

kirby007 on 29 November 2009

Also i don't say the Sony lost, but the way things look now they will since ps3 sales inclusing slim boost are smaller then the ps2 in a similair timeframe



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
leo-j on 29 November 2009
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
Carl2291 said:
All this proves is that the Original Xbox was trash compared to the PS2, PS3 and 360.

Infact... Why dont you do one of those special graph thingy's for PS3 and 360?

See which one of those is winning if you align the launches like that?


But that isn't the point of my OP

@ all the other people, my post lets us see that even though the ps3 is doing better atm then the 360 sony still lost

Nah, that just means that Sony didn't do as well as last gen, and Microsoft did better than last gen.  It's still to close to call either a winner, as it may even depend on which (if either) motion control is accepted by the public.


microsoft won marketshare didn't they?

Well they were out a year longer, and the generation isn't over.  Right now it's too close to say (it's practically a tie if you allign launches) and it could go either way.  Especially if Microsoft EOLs the 360 before Sony does the PS3...

and also when we do look at the hard numbers 360>xbox ps2>ps3

SONY>MICROSOFT in gaming hardware

so microsoft lost?



 

mM
kirby007 on 29 November 2009
Carl2291 said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
Carl2291 said:
All this proves is that the Original Xbox was trash compared to the PS2, PS3 and 360.

Infact... Why dont you do one of those special graph thingy's for PS3 and 360?

See which one of those is winning if you align the launches like that?


But that isn't the point of my OP

@ all the other people, my post lets us see that even though the ps3 is doing better atm then the 360 sony still lost

Nah, that just means that Sony didn't do as well as last gen, and Microsoft did better than last gen.  It's still to close to call either a winner, as it may even depend on which (if either) motion control is accepted by the public.


microsoft won marketshare didn't they?

Well they were out a year longer, and the generation isn't over.  Right now it's too close to say (it's practically a tie if you allign launches) and it could go either way.  Especially if Microsoft EOLs the 360 before Sony does the PS3...

and also when we do look at the hard numbers 360>xbox ps2>ps3

As of right now, PS2 > Everything, so thats hardly a bad thing.

How about this...

PS3 > PS1 > 360?


we can't do that due to totally different habit of living over the past few years



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 on 29 November 2009
leo-j said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
jlauro said:
kirby007 said:
Carl2291 said:
All this proves is that the Original Xbox was trash compared to the PS2, PS3 and 360.

Infact... Why dont you do one of those special graph thingy's for PS3 and 360?

See which one of those is winning if you align the launches like that?


But that isn't the point of my OP

@ all the other people, my post lets us see that even though the ps3 is doing better atm then the 360 sony still lost

Nah, that just means that Sony didn't do as well as last gen, and Microsoft did better than last gen.  It's still to close to call either a winner, as it may even depend on which (if either) motion control is accepted by the public.


microsoft won marketshare didn't they?

Well they were out a year longer, and the generation isn't over.  Right now it's too close to say (it's practically a tie if you allign launches) and it could go either way.  Especially if Microsoft EOLs the 360 before Sony does the PS3...

and also when we do look at the hard numbers 360>xbox ps2>ps3

SONY>MICROSOFT in gaming hardware

so microsoft lost?


No cause im talking about GROWTH



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

XxXProphecyXxX on 29 November 2009

WATS THE DIFFERENCE??? your still comparing the present sales to its past sales to determine its success basically you just proved that MS and Ninty are lossers this year because they didnt beat their last year sales THIS IS CLEARLY WHAT YOUR ARGUMENT IS!!!



Dark Chaos on 29 November 2009
letsdance said:
Dark Chaos said:
Blood_Tears said:
letsdance said:
Dark Chaos said:
I love all the nay sayers in this thread are all PS3 fans. They all scream false, but then actually think and can't find a reason why Kirby is wrong. LOL That itself is admitting Sony lost.


....? no one can say why the thread is false? how about 200K win over 360 this week?


BOOM!


How about the 6-7million lead for the 360? How about all the Profit sony lost from the PS1,2 gens

BOOMSHOT!!


Lets forget that MS hasnt even made profit on gaming division yet.... and that 6.66 million console lead was due to releasing a year early.

MS will break even for this gen. As for the losses involving the Xbox. Its was costs required to enter the market(sunk costs). So releasing a console early is MSs fault. PS2 was released first and no one talks about that. Plus theres was a reason as SONY wanted to include the bluray.