forest-spirit said:
SuperSteveyLes said:
forest-spirit said: I agree, this isn't the Nes days any more. Games need to be 90% cutscenes to fit into modern gaming. Nintendo has to learn this if they want Mario to become relevant again. |
90%, are you serious, I do like a few cutscenes, but that sounds like too much if you ask me.
|
It's a minimum. As I said in another thread (I think that was a Rol thread as well...) this isn't the Nes gen, with the technology of today we shouldn't have to play the game at all. Nintendo did a mistake with NSMBWii in that you have to die 8 times before you can watch the game play itself. If you could watch it from the beginning it would've been the game of the generation. A game of the future.
"In the past we played games. In the future we watch games." ~ Me.
Quote me.
|
And here we are back to the confusion of INTERACTIVE FICTION with games. Until videogames, and perhaps RPGs, games weren't things that had plots or stories. Games were originally competitive environments with winning and losing conditions, where you tried to beat people. But then along came videogames, and that apparently changed. Now, due to the fact videogames is a HUGE industry, people now thing that games are something that MUST have stories behind them. Well, that is NOT the case.
Maybe the future of interactive fiction will mean the end of the interactive part, but games will be games. People will still play board and cardgames, even if they are in a virtual format.