@perpride
While KZ2 and Uncharted 2 may have nice graphics there both on rail shooters (linear shooters) while Crysis has better graphics than both and has open world game play.
@perpride
While KZ2 and Uncharted 2 may have nice graphics there both on rail shooters (linear shooters) while Crysis has better graphics than both and has open world game play.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
What about Forza 3, lol? |
Forza 3 doesn't count. The unreleased GT5 already "Crushes" Forza 3.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
What about Forza 3, lol? |
You know what, you are right. It fully slipped my mind. Forza is deffinitley up there with the best looking games of this generation. I belive GT5 is better looking, but it would be utter fanboyism to deny Forza passage into the vault of greatness.
Pipedream24 said:
|
Actually if you would have waited 1 more second you would have seen my answer to this.
PS3 has some fantastic looking games to be sure, just like the Xbox had some great looking games last generation (and the N64 before that).
Still, the other consoles have some great looking games as well, and I'd hope that we all would take the time to look and see that while having great graphics is... great, it's not everything. Each console this generation has fantastic games which are a blast to play. That should be a bragging point in itself. 
PS3 fans are having a field day! But the fact (can you call something subjective a fact? I think you can!) of the matter is that while the PS3 has two or three graphically superior games (depending on your opinion of Metal Gear or Uncharted 1) it doesn't beat the 360 by a significant margin. And, since the PS3 DID come out a year later, we should totally expect it to provide better graphics. I mean, what were you guys thinking was going to happen?
There are people saying things like "PS3 first year games were as good as 360 2nd year games". I don't understand the logic in that. So, are we going to say Modern Warfare 2 on the PS3 should be compared to CoD World at War on the 360 since both came out 3 years into their system's respective life spans? It goes: PS3 games in 2007 are comparable to 360 games in 2007.
AND, a in a couple of years, the technical achievements of both consoles are going to look pretty damned identical. They're just going to look like 7th gen games, like Gamecube games look like 360 games look like PS2 games.
I loved Gears 2 (one of the best games I have played)...
But MGS4 has overall graphics better than it.
My opinion: Uncharted 2 > Killzone 2 > MGS4 > Gears 2 > Uncharted > Gears 1 > Forza 3
PS. I didn't play Siren yet.
perpride said:
Actually if you would have waited 1 more second you would have seen my answer to this. |
I wasn't taking a shot at you. Forza 3 has been downplayed massively because of GT5. And it's still at least 6 months off. Nice to see you give it props though.
| Smeags said: PS3 has some fantastic looking games to be sure, just like the Xbox had some great looking games last generation (and the N64 before that). Still, the other consoles have some great looking games as well, and I'd hope that we all would take the time to look and see that while having great graphics is... great, it's not everything. Each console this generation has fantastic games which are a blast to play. That should be a bragging point in itself. ![]() |
QFT
^ The guy above me how dare you put Forza 3 lower than Uncharted 1 and Gears :O
|
perpride said: ^ The guy above me how dare you put Forza 3 lower than Uncharted 1 and Gears :O |
Because Forza 3 has less details on the screen that the games cited and the graphics are not much above what was seen in Forza 2
.
But I may be wrong because I played the demo only.