PS3 fans are having a field day! But the fact (can you call something subjective a fact? I think you can!) of the matter is that while the PS3 has two or three graphically superior games (depending on your opinion of Metal Gear or Uncharted 1) it doesn't beat the 360 by a significant margin. And, since the PS3 DID come out a year later, we should totally expect it to provide better graphics. I mean, what were you guys thinking was going to happen?
There are people saying things like "PS3 first year games were as good as 360 2nd year games". I don't understand the logic in that. So, are we going to say Modern Warfare 2 on the PS3 should be compared to CoD World at War on the 360 since both came out 3 years into their system's respective life spans? It goes: PS3 games in 2007 are comparable to 360 games in 2007.
AND, a in a couple of years, the technical achievements of both consoles are going to look pretty damned identical. They're just going to look like 7th gen games, like Gamecube games look like 360 games look like PS2 games.
