^^
i do not see the site that i know in person there, yet their scores count.
and their reviews are horrible, and very biased.

you sure kowenicki?

In a 2007 episode billed as a "primer on our scoring system",[11]Adam and Morgan further elaborated on their ratings scale:A score of 1 is a game that "has to produce true crappiness, [through] the full cooperation of an entire development team - level designers taking off early to attend their children's soccer games, animators getting so high during their lunchbreak that they can't operate their mouse, and of course money hungry execs who will release anything if they can dupe kids into begging their moms for it." Example Given: 50 Cent: BulletproofA score of 2 "is such a difficult score to give, because it requires a game that fundamentally fails, but has a barely redeeming charm which makes it untenable to give a 1; it's that Suddenly Susancocktail of technical competence floated atop a pile of dreck." Example Given: Genji: Days of the BladeThere are different levels to a score of 3 - "there's the 3 that's a mix of very good and very bad elements (like Blood Will Tell) or 3's that have a great concept that's poorly executed (like Railroads!), and then there's those 3's that are just churned out because they know people will buy them even though there's nothing original in it (like every FIFA game ever)." Example Given: Sid Meier's Railroads!"There are really two kinds of games that get 4's regularly: these are great games with significant problems (like Dead Rising) and games that are amazing but just aren't suited for everyone (the Warhammer: Dark Crusadeexpansion or any of the Simsexpansions are good examples)." Example Given: Dead RisingTitles that earn a perfect 5 out of 5 are "those magnificent games which, whatever minor flaws they may have, call out to us and say, 'Buy me, you must buy me' ... " Example Given: ?kamiDuring this episode, the hosts also explained why they use a 5-point ratings system, rather than a 10- or even 100-point scale:

Never heard of these guys

Anyone want to take bets this review gets attached to his application to work for turn10, or some other Microsoft subsidiary?

well that's kinda lame.

They are norwegian, and they SUCK!! I hate them... I never read their crappy site.

Some other reviews they gave:

Resistance 2, Gamer: 7/10, Metacritic 8.7/10
Fat Princess, Gamer: 4/10, Metacritic 7.8/10
Motorstorm Pacific Rift, Gamer: 7/10, Metacritic 8.2/10

this is silly...we have a reviewer that didnt buy into hype or try to plz fanboi's and there precious exclusives and they get there opinions ignored

hehe take this from a Norwegian, this sites sucks, but then again that doesnt mean that the score shouldnt count. However this magazine just went into a partnership with spillmagasinet.com, which gave the game a 5/6 which is around 8/10. So i am not sure which score that should count.... also gamer.no didnt test the multiplayer so...

Itavisen another norwegian gaming site gave uncharted 2 6/6 btw