
I read in some thread that some people believed that the PS3 would close the gap to 5-6m after the holidays. Which, if it came true, made me think about how this would affect the console wars and how the fanboys would tear up this forum with 360 is doomed, PS3 to claim 2nd place, wait for Natal, new pricecut threads. And it also made me think about the end of this generation and the begining of next. And i cant see how this generation of console wars between the 2nd and 3rd place will ever be decided if previous predictions came true and the PS3 went to close the gap and maybe get it down below 5m.
Here's what i mean.
If this generation was to close while the 360 still had a 4m lead over the PS3. Would the 360 be the winner over PS3, or would the PS3 be the winner over 360 since it closed the gap that the 360 gained during its solo year on the market?
One side will argue that 3rd place is 3rd place because the 360 sold more consoles, end of story. While the other side will argue that since the PS3 managed to close the gap that the 360 gained prior to the PS3 and Wii being released on the market, and more. That they're the rightful owners of 2nd place and that they had the "more successful console".
What's your take on it?
(And yeah i know the Wii is in the race aswell. But for this topic its irrelevant.)







