How does one review prove the game is bad or Capcom didn't try?
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
| ItsaMii said: As long as Capcom loses money I am happy. Why waste resources on titles no one asked for like Bionic Commando and Spyborgs? |
A bunch of people asked for a proper Bionic Commando sequel since the NES days and even more after Rearmed's release, thank you.
About Spyborgs, yeah... That girl's butt got me hyped but that's about it! >_>
@ brute: Contra ReBirth got a 2/5? Not surprised, I'm sure the reviewer couldn't even get past the first stage and decided that it was a game not worth playing and paying for.
Random game thought :
Why is Bionic Commando Rearmed 2 getting so much hate? We finally get a real game and they're not even satisfied... I'm starting to hate the gaming community so f****** much...
Unfortunatly it was expected.... see Capcom, Wii needs some serious games you have like SF and RE, not crap like this :|
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
SHMUPGurus said:
A bunch of people asked for a proper Bionic Commando sequel since the NES days and even more after Rearmed's release, thank you. About Spyborgs, yeah... That girl's butt got me hyped but that's about it! >_> @ brute: Contra ReBirth got a 2/5? Not surprised, I'm sure the reviewer couldn't even get past the first stage and decided that it was a game not worth playing and paying for. |
Still that's a pretty low score.
They always complain that games are to easy, and now complain that they are to hard.
tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"
I'll wait to see what places like IGN says. That said, its looking bad for Capcom's "Wii franchise version of DMC"...
1 - Yeah, it is low
For a "double A" title, 59% is low, no matter how you see it
2 - It was doomed from the start
The concept is pretty hard to sort it out: a 2009 co-op brawler wishing to be more than a button masher. Its a tough path to choose, a tough mission to accomplish
3 - IGN had already pointed out a few months back...
... that while the game wasnt specificly bad, it had no reason to draw the player in. As they said, the game misses a "hook" to pull you in (http://wii.ign.com/articles/100/1004072p2.html )
In the end, i can imagine myself playing it alone and yawning.
No, im not buying. Capcom should have made a single player action game with motion plus mandatory
Is this is the "God of War" for the Wii that Capcom spoke of?
Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.
Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.
-Jim Sterling
I don't look at review scores anymore. I look at content now. So many games I've bought, and wondered why did it score so high? and So many games I've bought and wondered why did it score so low? Then I go back read the content of the review and realize why. So if I find this game appealing, I don't care if it gets a 2. I will be getting it. Same thing for a game that I feel is unappealing and gets a 9.
Well, it's a co-op beat 'em up that looks like it's had some effort put into it, so i'll give it a rent at the very least.
low scores, bad reputations, yet visually attractive. Reminds me of relationships from highschool
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
