I would like to put forth that the first one (besides being the better game) was more noteworthy for its originality and got more positive word of mouth.

Hmm, looking at critics and my opinion they're pretty even games. I think the first had a better story and worlds, but the second had better gameplay.

And yet the first sold a lot better. That's either due to novelty or just getting better word-of-mouth. One or the other.

Doesn't matter. The second was better.

I will fight you, Claude.

With words.

Your words are as hollow and empty as your fictional wife!

Someone please explain this to me: What is so "Disney" about this game other than Mickey Mouse being in it? If you look at gameplay mechanics, storyline, etc. you'll find that there is nothing "Disney" about it, other than characters.

Like I've said COUNTLESS times, just because Mickey Mouse is in the game doesn't mean that this is automatically going to fit the Wii demographic.

For all intensive purposes, this game is a Final Fantasy game with a different skin. Or if there was an FPS made by Bungie that was JUST LIKE Halo, but with Disney characters, the game should therefore be on the Wii???

this better be for wii but i have one question. didn't everyone already know this was coming for wii....

???? Since when?

If there is a new kingdom hearts, I really hope there is a Wii version. Imagine the expanded gamers recognising the disney characters and getting the game, liking the gameplay and starting to warm up to other RPGs :D