| Griffin said: And here i thought wii owners bought the wii for its gameplay and not the graphics, they want better graphics more then any 360/PS3 owner. For starters CoD4 was one of the worst looking games this gen, i played that game for around 20days, and the game is full of N64 quality textures, and just of poor quality overall and its only native 600p. But the gameplay is perfection, i could never wish for a better controlling or playing game in my life. The same can be said for CoD5, but it still never takes away from the amazing gameplay. The game could look like this on the other systems and i could not care. |
That is complete bullshit imo. What else can you judge from screens of an action game? Not much other than graphics. Also anybody who plays the Wii know they are not going to get the best of the best, and that by default disqualifies them from being graphic whores. Graphic whores are the people who spend hundreds of dollars on a new video card every 3 months, or over clock their cpu/gpu to get the tiniest bit of extra detail. What is unacceptable though, is when the game is below it's competition and isn't making use of a systems resources. I tell you this, if MW2 came out with PS2 level graphics, there would be outrage all over the internet. So to sum up my post Gameplay>Graphics yes, but that doesn't mean graphics aren't important for some. I personally don't care, as long as I can see what I'm doing, and it doesn't bother me to look at things. There are others more demanding though, and as long as they keep the idea that Gameplay is more important than Graphics, and don't ignore a good game because of it's poor graphics, I don't see a problem. From the start though, Wii fans have been bitter over the game being a 2 year later port, and this just pushes some over the edge.
