By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The Wii HAD to take the bullet, for all our sakes.

it's a dog eat dog world out there, it's just how business works, especially when you make a consumer product.

I say this, because the way people speak about studios closing down this generation, gives me the impression that studios never closed down at all last generation, and it's only happening now because of the HD consoles...but this clearly isn't the case since it happened last generation too...but don't forget were still in an economic strife, so in general more jobs are lost, and places closed down compared to when the economy is doing fine.



Around the Network
griffinA said:
MidnightRider85 said:
Yeah, but it keeps gaming tethered to old technology. TV and all other electronic media is heading into the land of better and more complex pictures what happens when the gulf between where other electronic media that is hd like films, tv programming, etc. grows even more beyond what is capable with gaming machines like Wii. Sompe people say Wii doesn't work that well with the hd tvs they already have.

First of all, for it's time the wii was pretty advanced when it first came out. It's not exactly "old technology," just not the technology that you're considering.

 

Secondly, gaming isn't a technology business, it's an entertainment business and the Wii is certainly doing a good job of entertaining people.

Actually it's both, which is why graphics in general improve over time, and why over time console hardware gets replaced, otherwise if what you say is true, then we would probably be stuck in PS1 times, since those games still provided us with entertainment, but that's clearly not the case, which is why I say it's both.



Nintendo saw that there was a market being completely overlooked and they acted on it.

Genyo Takeda said this "“If [Nintendo] had followed existing roadmaps we would have aimed to make [the Wii] faster and flashier. We’d have tried to improve the speed at which it displays stunning graphics. But we could not help but ask, ‘How big an impact would that really have on our customers?"

He compared it to the auto industry. Most people don't want a race-car. There is also a market for fuel-efficient, family-friendly cars.

As for third parties, they are doing well, just not where you'd think. Core gamers think of it all as shovel ware, but this is software that is appealing to a different audience. Nevertheless, Rayman Raving Rabbids, EA Sports Active, Carnival Games, Game Party, Deca Sports, and Big Beach Sports are just some of the 3rd party games that have sold 1 million or more.

Unfortunately Mad-world and The Conduit may never make that list.



Video_Game_Critic said:
I prefer a console that uses more creativity than high end graphics. Before the Wii was released manufactures were only focused on making the next generation of consoles more powerful. Now Microsoft and Sony are following in Nintendo's footsteps to make more creative systems by copying Nintendo. (A little ironic, but it will lead to a great 8th generation of consoles.) The Wii shows gamers are more interested in new gaming technology and not just better graphics. I think the Wii will have a positive influence on future consoles. By taking a graphical hit, Nintendo proved graphics are not everything in gaming.

Now now, Sony was very creative with the PS2, releasing the innovative eyetoy which neither it's competition did, as well as establishing Singstar, so do give credit where credit is due.

Also, Sony had some wii motion like stuff working way back in 2000, so I wouldn't say Sony is copying Nintendo at all, but it could even be that it's the other way around, take that as you like but here's a video, watch and see for your self.

 



Nintendo saw the potential, they created a market. They'll probably keep doing that but I think they intend to keep this one for a little bit, not sure.



Around the Network
MontanaHatchet said:
puffy said:
Well I know from experience that the people I know had more consoles per household in the PS2 gen compared with the PS1 gen. This would prove that the market was actually shrinking and wasn't just stagnant as the numbers suggest. Also the opening of new markets only adds to this theory.

I don't have a very large sample size though, maybe 10 people out of 15 had two systems compared with 4 out of 15 the previous gen.

Such compelling proof, how can I argue against that?

Yeah i mean it's not like the people he knew kept getting older gaining more financial ability (Or their parents) allowing them to afford moer.



SaviorX said:

 but we all were rookies one time (except for me, I was playing Super Contra at 2 years old).

pics or it didn't happen

i was playing pretty difficult games at that time (since all the games released were frustrating actually)



I agree. Once i saw those outlandish launch prices for 360, i figured that they had taken too great of a leap forward.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Mr Khan said:

I agree. Once i saw those outlandish launch prices for 360, i figured that they had taken too great of a leap forward.

And later when you saw the launch price for PS3, you fell off your chair :P



You know. The Wii is a refreshing break from playing so much HD (360, PS3) and I think that is one of the points Savior is making but I will have to admit I do hope next time around Nintendo launches a super powered HD console with a combination of Classic Style and Motion control because HD is nice too.



NINTENDO

nintendo forever . . .