Which developer is better.

Square:  Final Fantasy, Chrono Trigger, Kingdom Hearts, etc

Enix: Dragon Quest, Star Ocean, etc

Square used to be good, Enix used to be good and still are good. Atleast judging from Dragon Quest, never played Star Ocean. So for me it'd be Enix I guess, even though I love lots of Square's a bit older games.

Square-soft

Square

Square-Enix keeps dishing out repetitive RPG's. I pray to the RPG god FF13 doesn't suffer.

Square-soft all the way

Square

Square by a long shot for me.

Enix doesn't make Star Ocean though, Tri-Ace does. Enix just owned Tri-Ace I believe.

They obviously aren't too attached being that tri-ace is doing a game for sega.

Enix doesn't really develop any of their games. They just owned the IP's and sourced them out to various developers.

@Op For me Enix is the better publisher, Square the better developer. Enix knew what developers made good games and chose them, and buisness-wise they were smarter than Square. By that I mean they didn't almost get bankrupt again and again. Square was a beast in the Snes/PS1 era though. They used to be a developer that  I would buy a game, without knowing anything about it, if I saw their name on the box. Most of the time when I bought these games it was years after they were made, because I wasn't old enough to find them when they came out. The one exception was final fantasy though, and I've been a fan of the series since I was 4.

Both were among the best but Enix wins because of Terranigma and Valkyrie Profile.

Square-Soft