ps1 games cost about 1million to make, 5 million for ps2, wii cost about 7 and ps3/360 cost 8-60 (killzone)millionto make

 Exactly!

Sony will work with them, MS will throw money at them and Nintnedo offers what ? 

@Dodece

I remeber thinking about the same thing, i was so jelous when one of my friends got a dreamcast, damn him and crazy taxi, but every time i came into play the demo unit there didnt seem to be any new games, though i still remeber dreamcast comercials.... always wanted to demo that seaman game or what ever it was called

My local EB over the last week have doubled their Wii shelf space. It now has as much space as the 360 & DS.

The PSP has been relegated to the back of the store, and the PS3 is the only console with the "half-space" that the Wii used to have.

The PS2 still wins with 1.5x the space of the 360, Wii & DS.

...

I would say this is a pretty strong indication of what is happening now, and what is about to happen in the near future. 

So people are playing "who has the best lineup" again are they?

Try this - use a points system. Something like this:

 +2pt  for each title
 +1pt for each console exclusive title
 +1pt for each known brand name title
 +2pts for each known gaming name title
 +2..100pts for each "mega-hit" gaming name title (aka Halo)
 +1pt for each hyped title
 +2pts for each ultra-hyped title
 +1pt for each title published by platform holder
 +2pts for each title that opens a "new" genre (hardware selling?)

Points for casual titles? Points for new hardware/peripherals? Points for sequel to "big selling" title?

Words can not describe how miserable this thread is.

Go on, insult me.

1)Quality to me means that a game is fun and is executed well with a reasonable degree of polish, this doesn't necesarily mean that they have to cost a lot but more often than not this will turn out to be the case. For instance I believe RRR to be a quality title though you may not as it is based around mini-games. I would also call RE4 a quality title even though it is years old as it greatly benefits from the Wii's interface making the game a better gaming experience though by your definitions you disagree.

2)As I said before, I based my prediction over '08' and '09' so no I don't think it highly likely that Wii will do that much catching up by the end of '08' but wouldn't rule it out entirely. It all really depends on how quickly devs are jumping to Wii and at the moment all we can do is speculate though notice MH3 was just announced by Capcom, that's another bite out of 360's lead! Also I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt in regards to your announced quality titles for the 2 platforms, I could very well look at the lineups and come up with very different numbers.

3)So we are on the same page at least to some degree. You accept that at some point it is possible 3rd parties will start moving to Wii, the only real difference is that I'm giving a time frame of '08'-'09' whereas you are giving one of '09'+. I would also be pretty surprised if MH3 wasn't slated for late '08'.

4) I agree that a big chunk of Wii's lineup will be trash but that is the case for any console. At the end of the day if Wii continues to outperform it's rivals the way it has been it is simly logical to expect the majority of 3rd party support. Massive userbase plus cheap development relative to the other platforms means it's a no-brainer for companies who's primary aim is to make profit, I don't think you need a Masters in Economics to realise this.

Whatever happens... we can add MH3 to the Wii lineup ('08?), and take it away from the PS3 lineup.

Perfect example of "this thread in action" right there...