nice, since I didn't buy cod4 I'll be getting two games in one, talk about a bargain
PS3 for the win!!!!!!

Heck yeah my friend. This is what gaming should be all about, not focus on the goddamn boring multiplayer.

Personally, I thought WaW's campaign was better than MW's, so I can't wait to see if Infinity Ward are going to take the crown back! =P

Yeah... I have to say that sucks though. I didn't know about this until you created this thread. What were they thinking?!

The Resistance 2 dedicated coop was great. I hope to see more developers giving coop propert attention and not trying to shoe-horn it into their single player campaigns.

Vehicles in Battlefield or Warhawk are great and really add to the variety of the multiplayer. Vehicles in WaW are annoying and should be avoided.

I would buy any game developed by Infinity Ward. I would have a hard time renting a Treyarch game.

Zombies are always fun, so I guess that would be a step backwards.

You have some good points, but I cant believe you compared Treyarchs 'poor effort' againts Modern Warfare.

But I guess its just personal preference :)

Call of Duty is on a two year development cycle. Each developer basically does their own thing. Infinity Ward looked towards their own Modern Warfare to see what to add and subtract, not World at War. Ever notice that Infinity Ward didn't set the new game in World War II? Oh my goodness, another step backwards!

So what is Half-Life?

LOOOOL

I hope you didn't generalize that, because that would be ridiculous.

Lets see, new campaign, new multiplayer maps, buffed up engine. Beats me why I would buy this when I still have Golden Eye lying around here. Really it's just slight upgrades over that, and they probably won't even have cheat mode in it (LAME). I mean who needs any of these new fangled new things when I have old fangled old things?

You're question really makes no sense. I will buy MW2 because I want a new Modern Warfare game. I will buy Super Mario Galaxy 2 because I want a new Super Mario Galaxy Game. Will they be better than the originals? Who knows, they aren't out yet. But I still want more of what I enjoyed in the first games, so I will buy the second games. Seems like a pretty silly question.

Also I do not think single player games are rental only. Most of the games I own are single player games, or have multiplayer components I don't care much about. Maybe if you don't have the money a person might desire to focus on only purchasing long lasting multiplayer experiences. But that's not me. I buy games I want.

As a value proposition you personally may not find this game warranting your 60 dollars, because you are content with the product you have. However there will be millions who are willing to pay for the new maps, new campaign, beefed up engine, ect ect. If you don't want it, that's your prerogative. However I think it warrants the cash just as much as any sequel to a beloved game does.

And the main reason people will buy it - Their friends will all be buying it and having a cracking time online so they want to join in.