By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - WarHawk > Battlefield 1943 : SO... Better.. but harder learning curve.

Sardauk on 14 July 2009
Munkeh111 said:
Sardauk said:
kibebr said:
KylieDog: I disagree, Warhawk is balanced... I take down a lot of "planes warhawk", depending on the place and enemy, each vehicle or "on foot" os better, as strategy, but it´s balanced...

And YES, they have same gameplay and way that objective happnes... they are similar in some ways...

thanks!

Well but.... BF1943 is... impure... it is also on the 360...so less good than Warhawk for sure...

Warhawk is better, but also more expensive

For the moment.

I understand the goal of EA is to upgrade the game with DLCs ?



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.

Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 14 July 2009
Sardauk said:
Munkeh111 said:
Sardauk said:
kibebr said:
KylieDog: I disagree, Warhawk is balanced... I take down a lot of "planes warhawk", depending on the place and enemy, each vehicle or "on foot" os better, as strategy, but it´s balanced...

And YES, they have same gameplay and way that objective happnes... they are similar in some ways...

thanks!

Well but.... BF1943 is... impure... it is also on the 360...so less good than Warhawk for sure...

Warhawk is better, but also more expensive

For the moment.

I understand the goal of EA is to upgrade the game with DLCs ?

Like Sony did with Warhawk? Adding new vehicles, game modes and maps?



perpride on 14 July 2009

I haven't tried the new battlefield and probably wont. I'll stick to Warhawk for the simple fact that is is a TPS.



Sardauk on 14 July 2009
Munkeh111 said:
Sardauk said:
Munkeh111 said:
Sardauk said:
kibebr said:
KylieDog: I disagree, Warhawk is balanced... I take down a lot of "planes warhawk", depending on the place and enemy, each vehicle or "on foot" os better, as strategy, but it´s balanced...

And YES, they have same gameplay and way that objective happnes... they are similar in some ways...

thanks!

Well but.... BF1943 is... impure... it is also on the 360...so less good than Warhawk for sure...

Warhawk is better, but also more expensive

For the moment.

I understand the goal of EA is to upgrade the game with DLCs ?

Like Sony did with Warhawk? Adding new vehicles, game modes and maps?

That is the plan, no ?



 

Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.

Zlejedi on 14 July 2009

1943 feels completly dumbed down compared to pc versions of previous BFs. I'd say it money rip-off with only 3/4 maps.



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB

Around the Network
Munkeh111 on 14 July 2009
Zlejedi said:
1943 feels completly dumbed down compared to pc versions of previous BFs. I'd say it money rip-off with only 3/4 maps.

It costs $15, that is not much, especially when you consider most DLC is 800 points, and this is 1200, not bad for a game of this quality

 

@ sardauk, I am not sure, DICE do have a lot on their plates, but I think the PC version will be bigger



Garnett on 14 July 2009

Warhawk plays like a last gen TPS imo,BF43 is so much better,and this thread = damage control.



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

Vashyo on 14 July 2009

The only thing about 1943 is that it's just way too simple, it's fun with a group of friends but with no friends online I just can't get interested in playing. only three maps so far and no variety in weapons and classes. But it's still worth the money

I hope they would add a mode like the gold mode in bad company where you had to defend and the other team attacks and tries to destroy the defending teams gold crates.



Strategyking92 on 14 July 2009

OMFG, you people are so stupid! The BF series has been out waaay longer than the reinvented warhawk!
( I say reinvented, because the original warhawk came out in 1995 and was an arcade shooter)
If anything, you should compare BF 1942, BF 2, and BF 2142!
But I guess everybody thinks those games are shit too...



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

perpride on 15 July 2009
Garnett said:

Warhawk plays like a last gen TPS imo,BF43 is so much better,and this thread = damage control.

lol riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight you probably haven't even played Warhawk.