WHat I love is 1843 game is it has open world maps, total freedom, much like the incredible Enemy Territory: Quake Wars.

Terrible with only 12 vs 12 players though 1943, that sux.

I hope MAG will be very open world too. 256 players in the same warfield - amazing!!

Bad Company had open maps too, had destructible environments, more classes, and looks like better graphics.

I'm sad that Bad Company 2 won't have more players than 1, but the destructible environments are going to be AWESOME. In Bad Company, the destructible environments were like sprites, walls broke the same exact way and after a while, you can actually predict how a wall or roof will break after you shoot there.

In Bad Company 2, if you shoot somewhere, only that part exactly will chip away. Only the parts that are affected by the explosions will break. And you can fucking demolish a building completely now, instead of just stripping it naked (Can't wait to take a tank and just ram through a house with some snipers in it).

I honestly don't know why everyone's hyping this game, when Bad Company 1 is around 20ish dollars, and Bad Company 2 is coming around. I mean, I remember the OP of the original 1943 thread going "ZOMG, you can destroy trees!", when you could have done that already in Bad Company 1 (I love fucking taking a tank, and just creating a path through a thick forest).

This game looks only like a cheap DL only game for some casual and fun shooting.

Bad Company had open maps too, had destructible environments, more classes, and looks like better graphics.

I'm sad that Bad Company 2 won't have more players than 1, but the destructible environments are going to be AWESOME. In Bad Company, the destructible environments were like sprites, walls broke the same exact way and after a while, you can actually predict how a wall or roof will break after you shoot there.

Bad Company had open maps too, had destructible environments, more classes, and looks like better graphics.

I'm sad that Bad Company 2 won't have more players than 1, but the destructible environments are going to be AWESOME. In Bad Company, the destructible environments were like sprites, walls broke the same exact way and after a while, you can actually predict how a wall or roof will break after you shoot there.

In Bad Company 2, if you shoot somewhere, only that part exactly will chip away. Only the parts that are affected by the explosions will break. And you can fucking demolish a building completely now, instead of just stripping it naked (Can't wait to take a tank and just ram through a house with some snipers in it).

I honestly don't know why everyone's hyping this game, when Bad Company 1 is around 20ish dollars, and Bad Company 2 is coming around. I mean, I remember the OP of the original 1943 thread going "ZOMG, you can destroy trees!", when you could have done that already in Bad Company 1 (I love fucking taking a tank, and just creating a path through a thick forest).

This game looks only like a cheap DL only game for some casual and fun shooting.

Interesting, because from the screens of BF 1943 it looks like it's the same way, the destruction is 'false' in that buildings fall down and breaks in predictable patterns. I hate that.

But maybe the upgraded engine for Frostbyte, like u say Bad company 2 will be a lot better.