Grennpeace give their Q2 report on electronic companies about environmental policy and the console makers aint very good in the picture... specially Nintendo and Microsoft, Sony is a little better but still in the red... Does this say anything to you and does it have any weight in your purchases options until or from now on?

Source

Nintendo once again gives green peace the finger and tells it to go jump off a cliff.

While it is a bummer that the three are not very environmentally friendly. Once has to imagine that if they were to become more environmentally friendly, everything would cost more for them. Console making is already a risky business and the potential to lose alot of money is high. So it's only natural for them to find cheaper ways to produce their console whenever possible. Including being not-environmentally friendly.

Makes me sad.

From looking outside one can only ask for them to be less-green.

It's more environmentally friendly to stay home and play games than go out and burn fuel to go somewhere for entertainment.

These reports don't mean what you seem to think they mean.

They do not refer to the quality of a company's environmental policies. They refer to how readily the company will divulge their environmental policies to greenpeace

Which is the best answer you can give to Greenpeace on any matter.

It would help if Nintendo allowed greenpeace entry but Nintendo tells them to screw themselves and then greenpeace pretends they took at look in there and writes it out to sound like Nintendo is just shitty at keeping the world clean.

Nintendo's fat plumber is eating all the mushrooms.

Once again, no one cares that the Wii uses like 1/10th the power consumption of the other consoles and how that impacts the environment. It's simply about what materials they use in the development.