ironman, just reported your post and you can be sure you won't hear a reply from me again. You just showed any lack of community and discussion sense with your third paragraph. I won't answer you the same way because I don't think it would be appropriate. Bye.

You seemed to have had no problems jumping on the "Molyneux has a sick mind" bandwagon without actually knowing the man yet you're outraged when someone does something similar to you?

XD seriously? I was simply pointing out how stupid it is to say that the Milo game is for pedophiles. Only a pedophile would think that way, so in the future, try using a more objective reasoning for not liking a game, something like "I didn't like Neo pets" after all, that is basically what Milo is. Or perhaps, I don't like interacting with video game characters. I dunno, something with an ounce of sanity in it.

Of course I am. If I said he was jerking of with Natal, even without knowing when Milo would come to help him, I'm sure he would also feel like a personal attack, which was the case.

By the way, I didn't say "Molineaux has a sick mind". You are just trying to put words in my mouth to fit your goals. Won't work with me.

@ironman, you're once again calling me a paedophile, and I'm fine with it. Did you think I could be a victim of a paedophile once? Think twice before you speak... And I also think that even if that's not the case, only someone innocent, that never watches TV or never went out, can not think on something like that. I'm trully afraid if you ever have kids and don't think about the dangers that he might run into, and therefore be unable to prevent something like that / protect him.

I really don't want to follow your path of agressivness defending a point that's not more than an opinion to me and religion to you. You have faith Natal is the biggest thing since the wheel... OK. I have my doubts, just that.

Well if that is the case why did you have to bring it up? Seriously, I don't care what happened to you in the past, you should not be using that as a crutch do try and downplay a game that many others will find fun. I find it amusing that, instead of using an argument I can respect, you go straight to the old pedophile argument. Get real dude, you have a problem if you think that the game will only be for pedophiles. Also, who cares? it's a VIDEO GAME CHARACTER...or didn't you think of that. Also, I highly doubt that anything remotely sexual will be in the game, after all, the reason you cannot see the pictures you scan in, is so that Milo won't show you the dick you just drew on a sheet of paper. Seriously, can you come up with a more objective and origional argument. either one I listed above is fien, I can respect those, but when you come in here calling everybody sick for liking the Milo game, that doesn't fly with me.

Excuse me, I didn't even want to make this because I thought you would get there by yourself, but now I do...

My first post was:

"Look, I'm not going to discuss point by point... you can call it an evolution, whatever! Realkisticaly, in terms of use, the only thing Natal does that Eyetoy can't is to identify different people. Everything else is software (voice recognition, facial recognition, material, so on). But if you want to think it's a complete revolution and you're happy with it, it's fine ;)"

Then, my second:

"Don't you get that the technology is not important? What's important is the use they'll give it. Eyetoy is a faillure not because of the technology, but because of the use they give it. And Natal still as to show to what it was made for (well, unless it is to talk with a kid - sick frightning thing that, of course, won't work as Molineaux said - or to defend balls).

So, what you say about Eyetoy is applied to Natal. It doesn't matter what it can do. I don't want Natal to navigate over the menus. Hell, my problem with Natal is that I don't know why I want it for. Nothing they showed is slightly interesting to me."

Then you talked about the peadophile stuff.

Now tell me, when did I said anything about peadophiles in my posts? Who did bring that up? I said it before and I'll say it again... Milo is a sick frightning thing because of all it represents. If it worked like he say, I could see kids not going out because their friends on the TV (parents would love do not have to worry about them), or lonely people arriving home sad and talk with a f*cking kid on a f*cking TV, so on... I could give 100 examples that truly fits what Milo represents. And yes, is totally different if it was an alien, a kanguru, a doll, whatever... something that could break the realism there. Once again, I did not mention anything about peadophiles...

And no... I don't think you're one of them because you bring that up, because I truly believe it's common sense to know they exist and they're a real threat, but aperently I'm wrong.

Right there, you used the old pedophile argument for Milo...which is just sad.

Also, I explained how NATAL is different that they eyetoy...twice, but I suppose I will have to explain it a third time like always. Try reading my posts, you will see...unless your goggle are still cutting off bloodflow.

I suppose then, that all RPG games should be banned because I could give you hundreds of examples of people taking them too seriously and trying to "become" their character, (one of my x girlfriends come to mind). You cannot argue that lonely people will flock to the game when it's simply not true, Did lonely people flock to the Gigapet games? Or were they noprmal people who just wanted something fun to do?

No, I didn't. I meant what I said in the post above. I'll repeat it: "If it worked like he says, I could see kids not going out because their friends on the TV (parents would love do not have to worry about them), or lonely people arriving home sad and talk with a f*cking kid on a f*cking TV, so on... I could give 100 examples that truly fits what Milo represents."

You came up with that idea for two reasons: because you read it before and associated; or you are a peadophile, because apparently anyone that speaks about that is because it is one.

I'll now do what I said... you don't deserve any answer. Once again, I respectfuly ask you to think twice before accusing someone of being *enter prejurative adjective here, like peadophile, cunt, whore, whatever* just because they don't agree with you.

Dude, what is highlighted above is obviously a referance to pedophiles. Why else would you call it a sick and frightening thing? I was not calling you a pedophile, I was merely implying you could be one due to your statement above. It's a fair assumption, especially since so many people are using that sad argument against Milo.

Back on topic, there is no denying that Nintendo has an EYEtoy like device, but it cannot, and will not be NATAL. It lacks several key features, A second, infrared camera, a HD RGB main camera, a camera specific processor, and good software. That is the point I have been trying to make all along. The you came in here with your anctedotal argument.

natal is not all that different from what sony was doing with the eye toy last gen, sure its an upgrade but in the end they are both cameras that let you use your body to play... same with the dsi