| Dazkarieh said: Don't you get that the technology is not important? What's important is the use they'll give it. Eyetoy is a faillure not because of the technology, but because of the use they give it. And Natal still as to show to what it was made for (well, unless it is to talk with a kid - sick frightning thing that, of course, won't work as Molineaux said - or to defend balls). So, what you say about Eyetoy is applied to Natal. It doesn't matter what it can do. I don't want Natal to navigate over the menus. Hell, my problem with Natal is that I don't know why I want it for. Nothing they showed is slightly interesting to me. |
Right there, you used the old pedophile argument for Milo...which is just sad.
Also, I explained how NATAL is different that they eyetoy...twice, but I suppose I will have to explain it a third time like always. Try reading my posts, you will see...unless your goggle are still cutting off bloodflow.
I suppose then, that all RPG games should be banned because I could give you hundreds of examples of people taking them too seriously and trying to "become" their character, (one of my x girlfriends come to mind). You cannot argue that lonely people will flock to the game when it's simply not true, Did lonely people flock to the Gigapet games? Or were they noprmal people who just wanted something fun to do?
