Nintendo's 'Natal' ?

[Dazkarieh]

ironman said:

Dazkarieh said:

Don't you get that the technology is not important? What's important is the use they'll give it. Eyetoy is a faillure not because of the technology, but because of the use they give it. And Natal still as to show to what it was made for (well, unless it is to talk with a kid - sick frightning thing that, of course, won't work as Molineaux said - or to defend balls).

So, what you say about Eyetoy is applied to Natal. It doesn't matter what it can do. I don't want Natal to navigate over the menus. Hell, my problem with Natal is that I don't know why I want it for. Nothing they showed is slightly interesting to me.

Right there, you used the old pedophile argument for Milo...which is just sad.

No, I didn't. I meant what I said in the post above. I'll repeat it: "If it worked like he says, I could see kids not going out because their friends on the TV (parents would love do not have to worry about them), or lonely people arriving home sad and talk with a f*cking kid on a f*cking TV, so on... I could give 100 examples that truly fits what Milo represents."

You came up with that idea for two reasons: because you read it before and associated; or you are a peadophile, because apparently anyone that speaks about that is because it is one.

I'll now do what I said... you don't deserve any answer. Once again, I respectfuly ask you to think twice before accusing someone of being *enter prejurative adjective here, like peadophile, cunt, whore, whatever* just because they don't agree with you.