Dazkarieh said:
No, I didn't. I meant what I said in the post above. I'll repeat it: "If it worked like he says, I could see kids not going out because their friends on the TV (parents would love do not have to worry about them), or lonely people arriving home sad and talk with a f*cking kid on a f*cking TV, so on... I could give 100 examples that truly fits what Milo represents." You came up with that idea for two reasons: because you read it before and associated; or you are a peadophile, because apparently anyone that speaks about that is because it is one. I'll now do what I said... you don't deserve any answer. Once again, I respectfuly ask you to think twice before accusing someone of being *enter prejurative adjective here, like peadophile, cunt, whore, whatever* just because they don't agree with you. |
Dude, what is highlighted above is obviously a referance to pedophiles. Why else would you call it a sick and frightening thing? I was not calling you a pedophile, I was merely implying you could be one due to your statement above. It's a fair assumption, especially since so many people are using that sad argument against Milo.
Back on topic, there is no denying that Nintendo has an EYEtoy like device, but it cannot, and will not be NATAL. It lacks several key features, A second, infrared camera, a HD RGB main camera, a camera specific processor, and good software. That is the point I have been trying to make all along. The you came in here with your anctedotal argument.








