Slimebeast said:
|
Ripped :)
Slimebeast said:
|
Ripped :)
awesome an opportinity to work for the best game developers on history? Talk about the chance of a lifetime. I wish i was skilled enough
Long Live SHIO!
| FaRmLaNd said: Halo was a graphical powerhouse last gen. How quickly people forget... |
quoted for being true.
But this is like saying MS is milking Halo. So far, there are 3 original Halo games on the market. In 8 years, this is not that much. There were 8 Maddens.^^
There is ONE other Halo game, that used the Halo brand and transfered it to a completly different genre --> Halo Wars.
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
The multiplayer beta for Reach will almost assuredly not be taking place this fall. ODST will come with a code to join the beta when it does start.
| 1337 Gamer said: awesome an opportinity to work for the best game developers on history? Talk about the chance of a lifetime. I wish i was skilled enough |
Blizzard is hiring too?
| 1337 Gamer said: awesome an opportinity to work for the best game developers on history? Talk about the chance of a lifetime. I wish i was skilled enough |
Nintendo is hiring?
Seriously, you have to admit that Nintendo is a slightly better developer than Bungie, especially considering they've been developing for 28 years to Bungie's 18 (although people have only cared about Bungie for the last 8 years, when they've been making Halo). In fact, Bungie probably isn't in the top five.
Back on topic, Halo 3 wasn't exactly a graphical powerhouse. It didn't look bad, it looked very good, but it was nothing amazing. Hopefully their new game will look better than Halo 3, but by that time, a lot of better looking games will probably be out.
Well, this sounds good. Sounds like they want someone from Crytek :P
And whilst Halo 3 might not have the greatest graphics around, don't forget Bungie's previous technical acheievements. I believe Halo 2 was one of the first games to incorporate normal mapping (first being Far Cry, made by Crytek).
Kantor said:
Nintendo is hiring? Seriously, you have to admit that Nintendo is a slightly better developer than Bungie, especially considering they've been developing for 28 years to Bungie's 18 (although people have only cared about Bungie for the last 8 years, when they've been making Halo). In fact, Bungie probably isn't in the top five. Back on topic, Halo 3 wasn't exactly a graphical powerhouse. It didn't look bad, it looked very good, but it was nothing amazing. Hopefully their new game will look better than Halo 3, but by that time, a lot of better looking games will probably be out. |
By 'people', you must mean console gamers, because Bungie was well known to the pc community, and revered by the Mac one well before Halo came around.
JaggedSac said:
By 'people', you must mean console gamers, because Bungie was well known to the pc community, and revered by the Mac one well before Halo came around. |
But they only made a couple of 'Myth' games rite? Was they on Mac too?
JaggedSac said:
By 'people', you must mean console gamers, because Bungie was well known to the pc community, and revered by the Mac one well before Halo came around. |
Ask a typical Halo fan what Bungie's first game was, 90% would say "Halo".
Halo was what put Bungie on the map, and it's not PC gamers singing their praises now, it's 360 gamers.