By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - How Halo killed the 360

Legend11 said:

How can you take an author's opinion seriously who makes an article called "The Top 6 Greatest Fighters Ever!" and has Battle Arena Toshinden in that list? And yes I'm not joking, I went to look at his other articles and he has nonsense like that.

And anyone who continually has to put something like this at the front of his articles "At the risk of making our site seem Sony biased" you have to take everything they say with a grain of salt.

Oh and in case anyone was wondering he gave Lair an overall review score of 8.9.

Anyways the article that this thread is linked to is ridiculous, we may as well unban Hus again and get him to write up an article about the 360, it might actually be more fair and insightful.


 toshinden was good...

nothing to compare with virtua fighter ...

 

but sonians in that period really were convinced that world limits were toshinden,"riiiidge racer" and tekken...

 poor boys...

the ones grow up and now write these kind of articles...

 



Around the Network
Gamerace said:
The biggest problem with the article, imo, is the assumption that having superior graphics will give the PS3 a win over the 360. Odd, since both the xbox and gamecube were graphically superior to the PS2, but it didn't help them.

In fact, never, in any generation of video games has the most powerful system won. So why would it help the PS3 now?

 that could be...

because casual gamers that simply are ignorant base their choice only on what they see.

 they even don't understand if  a scene is in game or a cg movie...(ps1 effect...)

 

but no problem...

because casual gamer don't spend much money on technology...

ignorant casual gamer is buying now an hd ready tv for 1200$!!!!!

it is stupid...

he will never get the difference between 720p and 1080p...

american casual gamer is even more stupid!!!!

simply give it a game where to use a pistol or a machine gun...it's their nature...

in the past was duck hunt  nowdays is halo...

 

in the future link's crossbow mini game...eheheh

 



american casual gamers are even more stupid huh? how do you figure that? Your post is non sensical and rambling. If America is so stupid why do people from all over the world come here go to college. I guess you want to bring mussolini back



I hope that was sarcasm ripper.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

ripper said:
american casual gamers are even more stupid huh? how do you figure that? Your post is non sensical and rambling. If America is so stupid why do people from all over the world come here go to college. I guess you want to bring mussolini back

 First you try to paint gay people as immoral (and products of child abuse) and then you do this. What sockpuppet account is this?



Around the Network
leo-j said:
It killed the 360 by having the worst online play of any game.

 BAN HIM lol jk.

 

Halo 3 defines online-play a**hole. 



About my previous post, I was a little out of line, but seriously, should we even listen to leo-j's opinion on anything?



Engelos said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
Engelos said:
Article does not say graphics win console wars so stop trying to discredit it with spins. If they already reached a point where they have to make compromises this early its not a good thing.

Till now 360 has had the best "next gen game" but thats quickly coming to an end. PS3 has caught up a bit to fast for comfort, Ut3 and Uncharted are equal to the best 360 has and in 2008 the xbox falls behind the PS3 very fast.


caught up in where? graphics? nope not yet, you wont see a difference for quite a while, the 360 actually has a stronger gpu which is used for graphics, and the ps3 has a more cpu and other things, so yes in a few years ps3 will be a little better looking, not by much.

I dont know how you can say it will fall behind fast, sales wise, gameplay wise, or graphic wise


 

killzone2 GT5, PS3 graphics are already superior.

 If Gran Turismo 5 was graphically superior to anything, then it's onlookers in the crowd wouldn't be 2D pieces of cardboard like an N64 wrestling game.

 

Sorry for the triple post. 



Engelos said:
Legend11 said:
It's funny how some people are trying to come up with the most ridiculous reasons for why Halo 3 could a bad thing for the 360.
 You totally missed the jist of it.

Read then think about it, read agian and think some more maybe you will get it. 

A poorly written article that comes off as desperatly claiming Halo 3 is a bad thing

Even if you assume his argument and logic is sound, the title still makes no sense



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away" 

rather sad article if you ask me, didnt he give lair a 8.9? i think he just lost all credability



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.