A solid 95, even though it will be better than the first it will lose a couple of points due to being a sequel. It would need to be scarily good to outscore Galaxy, but knowing Nintendo it's not out of the realms of possibility.

95+, simply because reviewers are biased.

Will certainly be less than Galaxy even if you can say it is a better game if each is considered in isolation. Sequels always score less than the original because they are not as revolutionary so they are marked down for not being a completely new experience.

90 because sequels tend to get less score no matter if they're better.

ppl(critics) will look at this like an expansion more than a stand alone, so a 94, no one would be anbry or overly excited. it's a win-win for them

edit: this is also my 666th post, 666 ftw!!!

I'll go with 90

Yeah, biased towards HD consoles and that's why they give wii games always lower scores except first party Nintendo games :) 

The fact SMG got 97% was because it was great and not because biased reviews. Why bother posting in the nintendo section if you're never going to post something nice. 

Yeah, they were just like Halo 3, GTA 4 and many other great HD-games.

Oh, is there a rule that you have to worship nintendo to post here? Please, show me that rule. :)

88-90

There's too much hate now. It'll affect scores for sure.

im guessing 74-82