So, you think I came into the Sony forum looking to start trouble? I only select topics that appear on the front page and that I have posted in before.

I NEVER search through any of the forums. My participation on this site is usually limited to the homepage.

Aside from that, regardless of what forum this is located in, there is enough false information floating around on the internet....

And lets be honest, on this site...Sony fanboys are the most extreme...and they clearly outnumber the other groups...and they do not make the smallest attempt to be subtle. Their blind bias is tactless and very much obvious.

Oh, and I guess it's Ok for Sony fanboys to instult and misconstrue the intent of posters who are just trying to make a little sense of their ramblings?

BITTORRENT

No, I don't think you meant to start trouble. But that line I bolded in your previous post seemed like it was a cheap shot and could have easily been left out of your post. I'll make this easy for you. Would you like somebody coming into your house and calling you[or your friends, for lack of a better analogy] annoying? I don't think so. You came into the Sony forums and called Sony fanboys annoying. That's rude and immature if you ask me. I don't really mean to single you out because there are A LOT worse posters than you who say a lot worse things, and I can't be sure that Sony fans don't do the same in Microsoft and Nintendo forums because I don't visit them, but it had to be said.

Oh, and one last thing @bolded. This site does have a majority of Sony fans, so yes it's logical that Sony'd have the most fanboys as well. But if you've ever visited Gamespot or IGN forums, it's sickening sometimes.

And THAT is exactly what I mean.  I believe that Sony paid Rockstar, and that belief has just as much proof as your statement.  It is inconceivable to some that companies may make an exclusive for the 360 for anything other than money. 

Larger userbase?  Friendlier development platform?  More PC-like architechture?  Most of the power without most of the pain?  Nah... it must be about money. 

Then people wonder why there is such backlash!  If I were a 360 fan, I would be laughing about/ tearing this apart too.  Money-hatting happens on all sides (well, probably not Nintendo, looking at 3rd party output).  Only a fool would believe otherwise.

LOL I had no idea that the Sony's forum was their home? Have they finished making the payments on that home? Whatever point you are/were trying to make, I am not convinced. I appreciate your efforts to be civil though. Blatantly communicating false or misleading information should be corrected regardless of where it happens...

You can call me whatever you like, you can dress it up however you like...it doesn't change the facts. This thread is full of illogical Sony fanboys and when someone attempts to interject with logic...said posters are labeled as "jealous" or "bashers" LOL That tickles me.

Also, your "home" example isn't really effective or logical...It's labeled the Sony forum because that's where Sony related topics are discussed. It isn't owned by Sony fanboys or supporters collectively...and it is not a safe zone for fanboys to spew misleading nonsense unchallenged...I apologize if you were under the impression that it was.

It's funny that you question my maturity, because I question your ability to rationalize given the things you have communicated thus far.

That is all...

Ah, the ole "Mirson is anti-PS3."

fyi: I like the PS3, PS3 fanboys are a different story. You'd be surprised how often I use my PS3. Hell, I just got off playing Warhawk and KZ2 for 3 hours straight.

I would like to refer you to my "bidding war" argument. I do not completely dismiss the idea that Sony could possibly be doing the old moneyhat routine to nab this as exclusive but I highly doubt it. As I stated before, Sony cannot, repeat, CANNOT win in a bidding war against MS. If sony was paying R* for exclusivity, I assure you, MS would double the deal and have it too on their system. MS has already proven to want any 3rd party game that has ever been tied to the Sony name. This is R* after all, anything they do is big. Why would MS just decide to pass this up? Truth of the matter is, they wouldn't. Unfortunately for them, this is not an issue of money, but an entirely different agenda at hand.

And this goes for big 3rd party games such as MGS4 as well. We know MS wants it, if it were about money, they would already have it by now. If Sony was moneyhatting they would not have lost FFXIII, DMC4, AC, GTA4, etc exclusivity. That would be the only purpose of moneyhatting in the first place, securing the exclusive(or in MS's case, getting companies to break exclusivity).

@CGI

surely you can see the plausability of the above.

I was wondering aren't those guys in Eight Days agents? Too me that game has a little GTA vibe. Sony (London) and Rockstar North working together? Isn't blending clips with gameplay genre define-ing?

Just a thought.

Eight Days was definitely not a counter-intelligence thriller set in the 70s.

It was/would have been like Uncharted, but with more focus on chases & guns.

Rstar make quality games.