By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Media and Press who won E3

JEDE3 said:
Hyruken - Gamespot is a more well known website than this one. More people go on it.... ther are more 360 owners... you don't think gamespot had fanboys voting in their poll?

If there's anyone sounding like a fanboy here it's you



Around the Network

Reads DKII post.... reads the signatures of the people posting in here... comes to a pretty good conclusion



i think media likes Call of Duty sooooooooooooooo much...



axumblade said:
Beoulve said:
axumblade said:
Beoulve said:
The Ubisoft conference proves that celebrities doesn't necessarily make a good show. That is the most boring pile of crap I've seen (but last year's Nintendo show is still the worst yet). And that guy from The Soup who was the host looked at the teleprompter 90% of the time.

But it doesn't help Nintendo having people like Reggie and Cammy as hosts either. They feel so fake and awkward, like a really bad american commercial with happy fake families telling how much they love each other.

I find Don Mattick to be annoying as well with the constant clapping, dude just stop it.

The Sony host seemed natural to me, he played along when people cheered (mocked) the Hannah Montana show, and didn't take himself too seriously. Also the audience was more active than in the other conferences. The Nintendo show had a lot of awkward silence...

I agree with this statement though I don't think Nintendo should be dropped so low because they did have some great announcements. 

The Microsoft conference got on my nerves a little because they tried to use star power. I'm cool with seeing Ringo and Paul but I don't really care to see Yoko Ono on the show. And Steven Speilberg was just like "WTF?" But otherwise, I was a big fan of what Microsoft offered.

Ubisoft. Someone should have terminated James Cameron so he couldn't proceed to waste a half an hour of my life talking about some movie/game that he didn't even bother bringing in any footage of. I felt bad for Pele because of the technical difficulties and everything like that. I like The Soup but yeah...he wasn't the greatest host either.

1. I agree with you! It's just one of the things that brings the Nintendo conference down. I still think it was ok. But I enjoyed watching Sony and Microsoft more, mainly because they have more games I'm interested in.

 

2. That pissed me off >_< He talked about the game and movie so much that I actually looked forward to seeing a trailer or whatever, and then after listening to him blabbering for 20 minutes he walks off the stage and then it's on to the next topic, WTF??!!!!! But what they do show us is a million petz and bling glamour bitch whatever games, come on!! They didn't even show any actual gameplay from Assassin's Creed 2, yet they played the game on both Sony and Microsoft's conferences! What were they thinking? The more I think about Ubisoft's conference, I actually think it might have sucked more than Nintendo's 2008 conference...

The only reasons I liked Ubisofts was because of the Rabbids, Red Steel 2 (vast improvement over the original), a replay of Splinter Cell:Conviction (looks great imo), and Assassin's Creed 2 trailer (also vast improvement over the original because I like the setting mainly).

I had already seen Assasin's Creed 2 on the Microsoft conference, and they actually played it there, so I just find it strange that they didn't do it on their own conference. Splinter Cell was awesome, but again, they already showed it at MS conference. Rabbids was annoying and amusing at the same time :P

Now, Red Steel 2 really caught me off guard. I was expecting some mediocre crap, but that game looks like a winner!



axumblade said:
Beoulve said:

I had already seen Assasin's Creed 2 on the Microsoft conference, and they actually played it there, so I just find it strange that they didn't do it on their own conference. Splinter Cell was awesome, but again, they already showed it at MS conference. Rabbids was annoying and amusing at the same time :P

Now, Red Steel 2 really caught me off guard. I was expecting some mediocre crap, but that game looks like a winner!

I really don't remember seeing Assassin's Creed in the Microsoft conference. I do remember seeing it at Sony's conference because I lost the ability to control my salivary glands at the time. I very well could have just missed it but I thought I saw everything there. I like the Rabbids because I enjoy slightly insane idiotic cartoons.

Hmmm...suddently I'm not so sure I saw it at the Microsoft conference... When I think about it, the guy at the Ubisoft conference (one of the french dudes) said they were gonna show us gameplay from Assassin's Creed 2, maybe that's what pissed me off... You know, because they didn't. They only showed the opening movie or whatever. I'm not sure...



Around the Network

Yeah, he stood there talking in front of a title screen. Why didn't they just show video from the game while he was talking? That segment was so fucking weak. It's due out in December (I think), so they should have lots of footage. And I agree with you on Assassin's Creed 2's setting. I was in Venice last summer, amazing place.




disolitude said:


I dont know. To me presentation means a lot for a conference like this, and I don't think im a shallow gamer (whatever that is)

Like Sony looked like they didn't know what thye were doing. Jack Trenton was sweating like crazy, the motion control guys were nervous and shaking, KAz Harai was arrogant and looked like he didnt give a shit...

Nintendo I think had a more composed conference than Sony which was all over the place.

Sony had lots of content, but like I said they screwed up with presentation...For motion controls demo they did, the following analogy works best "if you stick your dick in a pudding, no one is really going to eat it...even if its the best pudding around."

 

I see it very differently.

 

Microsoft was very much "In your face mister short attention span person" Like it was clearly made in a proffessional manner and pretty detached from the audience itself. Very much "hey look at us, over here, hey wuh i'm jumping" Like a kid wanting to get your attention and don't know how to get it :p

 

Nintendos was very PR related. Pretty much the whole thing we PRPPRPRPPRPRPR supermario PRPRPPRPRPRPR again very detached from the audience.

 

Sonys conference however, was more homey and relaxed. Yea tretton was nervous. Ofcourse he was. He even said that he was (which btw is a great mean to help yourself calm down when you are nervous.)

And sony just took it nice and easy. The whole crowd got sucked up in the conference and it wasn't all about trying to pass off some shit that isn't real (coincidentially) but very much about just being down to earth, showing some cool stuff to some people.

I also really gotta give them props for bringing actual engineers of the motion controller onto the stage instead of some pr person whos been vaguely brief'd on how the damned thing works. .. And so many other live demos :p i really found that awesome

And again ofcourse the engineer was nervous man. Hes not used to being on a stage.

Overall I liked sonys conference a whole lot more.. but it just goes to show that people has different tastes in what makes a good e3 presentation.



Check out my game about moles ^

In all seriousness, I do not think it is bias.

Game site readers and Game Journalism love new stuff and hype.

When the motion controller was announced, there was plenty of hype surrounding Red Steel and a possible Star Wars game (and much more).

Game site readers and GJ love think about potential and possibilities.

On a side note: The last dozen or so reviews I read, I felt like the reviewer barely played the game. These were games on all different consoles.

Gamers like to play games.



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

thx1139 said:
Some comment on whys from my point of view.

WM+ and WiiSports Resort were unveiled last year and it comes out in a couple of weeks. This is a definite negative to the Nintendo score. Had they been brand new introductions the value would be signifigantly higher. Also as for WM+ to many in the mainstream and to many people I know they thought they already had this with the Wii.

Metroid - Yes it is different this time with Tecmo, but I was like jeez another Metroid. Yes Sony and MS have sequels to games as well, but they have had a great deal more big releases between them and didnt just announce a 3 pack of the other Metroid games for the Wii just a couple of weeks back.

SMG2 and NSMB - Similiar could have been said about SMG2 and NSMB and it does become even more so the issue with them both being Mario platformers. It doesnt help much that the SMG2 looks just like SMG and NSMB is perceived as mostly a DS port.

Wii Vitality Sensor - Not only people were like whats that for, but i was also wondering (have seen a couple articles that bring this up as well) why attached to the WiiMote. Why not a pulse monitor watch like device that wireless connects to the Wii. Why a wired attachment to the WiiMote.

Also to many (me included) Nintendo and Sony press conferences are actually 4 press conferences because of supporting both portable and console. MS spent nearly 2 nonstop hours showing content and cool stuff for just 1 console. Nintendo spent 1 hour on 2 consoles and still had time for statistics. Sony was in the middle with 1.5 hours of content spread across 2 platforms and had time for statistics.

You're joking right? Prime 3 was released in 07 and Other M will come in 2010 at the earliest. In that same gap of time Halo 3, Halo Wars, Halo 3 ODST, and Halo Reach will all happen. I don't think anyoen can pretend to be exasperated with a series that went on an 8 year haitus versus one that has only been ramping up its entries by an alarming amount.

 



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

the media has spolken. microsoft won e3.